• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GRACE 和 TIMI 风险评分而非应激成像预测排除方案后胸痛患者的长期心血管随访结果。

GRACE and TIMI risk scores but not stress imaging predict long-term cardiovascular follow-up in patients with chest pain after a rule-out protocol.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2011 Aug;19(7-8):324-30. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0154-9.

DOI:10.1007/s12471-011-0154-9
PMID:21584800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3144333/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term prognostic value of stress imaging and clinical risk scoring for cardiovascular mortality in chest pain patients after ruling out acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

A standard rule-out protocol was performed in emergency room patients with a normal or non-diagnostic admission electrocardiogram (ECG) within 6 h of chest pain onset. ACS patients were identified by troponin T, recurrent angina and serial ECG. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) was performed after ACS was ruled out. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) was performed within 6 months in an outpatient setting according to the physician's discretion.

RESULTS

524 patients were included. GRACE and TIMI risk scores were 75 (57-96) and 1 (0-2) in the rule-out ACS group, and 89 (74-107) and 2 (1-3) in the ACS group, respectively (median, interquartile range). Follow-up (median 9.4 (8.9-10.0) years) was complete in 96%. 350 of 379 rule-out ACS patients had an interpretable DSE and 52 patients underwent an MPS. 21 of the rule-out ACS patients (6%) died of a cardiovascular cause compared with 24 (17%) ACS patients (p < 0.001). For rule-out ACS patients, C-statistics were 0.829 and 0.803 for the GRACE and TIMI scores. In these patients, DSE and MPS outcome did not predict long-term cardiovascular mortality. In multivariate analysis, known chronic heart failure, ACE inhibitor use, and GRACE score were independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

TIMI and GRACE score but not DSE and MPS are accurate predictors of long-term cardiovascular mortality, even in chest pain patients with a normal or non-diagnostic electrocardiogram undergoing a rule-out protocol.

摘要

目的

确定在排除急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后,对胸痛患者进行应激成像和临床风险评分对心血管死亡率的长期预后价值。

方法

对胸痛发作后 6 小时内心电图(ECG)正常或非诊断性入院的急诊室患者进行标准排除方案。通过肌钙蛋白 T、复发性心绞痛和连续 ECG 确定 ACS 患者。排除 ACS 后行多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)检查。根据医生的判断,在门诊 6 个月内进行心肌灌注闪烁显像(MPS)。

结果

共纳入 524 例患者。排除 ACS 组的 GRACE 和 TIMI 评分分别为 75(57-96)和 1(0-2),ACS 组分别为 89(74-107)和 2(1-3)(中位数,四分位间距)。96%的患者完成了中位随访 9.4(8.9-10.0)年。350 例排除 ACS 的患者可进行可解释的 DSE 检查,52 例患者进行 MPS 检查。与 24 例 ACS 患者(17%)相比,21 例排除 ACS 的患者(6%)死于心血管原因(p<0.001)。对于排除 ACS 的患者,GRACE 和 TIMI 评分的 C 统计量分别为 0.829 和 0.803。在这些患者中,DSE 和 MPS 结果并不能预测长期心血管死亡率。多变量分析显示,已知慢性心力衰竭、ACE 抑制剂的使用和 GRACE 评分是心血管死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

TIMI 和 GRACE 评分而不是 DSE 和 MPS 是预测长期心血管死亡率的准确指标,即使在进行排除方案的心电图正常或非诊断性胸痛患者中也是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c39/3144333/aee1408c125f/12471_2011_154_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c39/3144333/aee1408c125f/12471_2011_154_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c39/3144333/aee1408c125f/12471_2011_154_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
GRACE and TIMI risk scores but not stress imaging predict long-term cardiovascular follow-up in patients with chest pain after a rule-out protocol.GRACE 和 TIMI 风险评分而非应激成像预测排除方案后胸痛患者的长期心血管随访结果。
Neth Heart J. 2011 Aug;19(7-8):324-30. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0154-9.
2
Comparison of traditional cardiovascular risk models and coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by computed tomography for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain.比较传统心血管风险模型与计算机断层扫描检测到的冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块,用于预测急性胸痛患者的急性冠状动脉综合征。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(8):934-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01417.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
3
N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide identifies patients with chest pain at high long-term cardiovascular risk.N-末端脑利钠肽前体可识别出具有高长期心血管风险的胸痛患者。
Am J Med. 2011 Oct;124(10):961-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.05.026.
4
Evaluation and comparison of six GRACE models for the stratification of undifferentiated chest pain in the emergency department.评估和比较六个 GRACE 模型在急诊科对未分化胸痛的分层作用。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01476-3.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of troponin T measured ≥6h after symptom onset for ruling out myocardial infarction.症状发作后 6 小时以上测量肌钙蛋白 T 对排除心肌梗死的诊断准确性。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jun;54(3):153-161. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1699248. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
Does simplicity compromise accuracy in ACS risk prediction? A retrospective analysis of the TIMI and GRACE risk scores.ACS 风险预测中简单化是否会影响准确性?TIMI 和 GRACE 风险评分的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 23;4(11):e7947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007947.
7
Prognostic value of predischarge dobutamine stress echocardiography in chest pain patients with a negative cardiac troponin T.出院前多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图对心肌肌钙蛋白T阴性胸痛患者的预后价值
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Feb 19;41(4):596-602. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02897-8.
8
Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome.高敏肌钙蛋白 I 在 2 小时诊断策略中的验证,以评估急诊科疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者 30 天结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 1;62(14):1242-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.078. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
Predictive value of NT-proBNP for 30-day mortality in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a comparison with the GRACE and TIMI risk scores.NT-proBNP对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者30天死亡率的预测价值:与GRACE和TIMI风险评分的比较
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Nov 21;12:471-476. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S117204. eCollection 2016.
10
Chest pain presenting to the Emergency Department--to stratify risk with GRACE or TIMI?因胸痛就诊于急诊科——采用GRACE评分还是TIMI评分来分层风险?
Resuscitation. 2007 Jul;74(1):90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.11.023. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Indirect comparison of TIMI, HEART and GRACE for predicting major cardiovascular events in patients admitted to the emergency department with acute chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.系统评价和荟萃分析:比较 TIMI、HEART 和 GRACE 评分预测急诊科因急性胸痛入院的患者发生主要心血管事件的能力。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e048356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048356.
2
Comparison of TIMI and Gensini score in patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain, who underwent coronary angiography.对因胸痛入住急诊科且接受了冠状动脉造影的患者的TIMI评分和Gensini评分进行比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Mar 1;20:343-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889600.
3

本文引用的文献

1
ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2007年不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订2002年不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南写作委员会)报告:与美国急诊医师学会、心血管造影和介入学会以及胸外科医师学会合作制定:得到美国心血管和肺康复协会以及学术急诊医学学会认可。
Circulation. 2007 Aug 14;116(7):e148-304. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181940. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
2
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗指南
Coronary and cerebral air embolism: a rare complication of computed tomography-guided transthoracic lung biopsy.
冠状动脉和脑空气栓塞:计算机断层扫描引导下经胸肺活检的一种罕见并发症。
Neth Heart J. 2013 Oct;21(10):464-6. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0411-1.
4
Chest pain without ST elevation: a continuing challenge.无ST段抬高的胸痛:持续的挑战。
Neth Heart J. 2011 Aug;19(7-8):317-8. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0172-7.
Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(13):1598-660. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm161. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
3
Short- and long-term risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: the added value of quantitative ST-segment depression and multiple biomarkers.急性冠状动脉综合征的短期和长期风险分层:定量ST段压低和多种生物标志物的附加价值
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):939-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.085.
4
Usefulness of early exercise testing and clinical risk score for prognostic evaluation in chest pain units without preexisting evidence of myocardial ischemia.早期运动试验和临床风险评分对无既往心肌缺血证据的胸痛单元预后评估的有用性。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Mar 1;97(5):633-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.107. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
5
Clinical trial--derived risk model may not generalize to real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome.来自临床试验的风险模型可能不适用于现实世界中的急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
Am Heart J. 2004 Dec;148(6):1020-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.014.
6
Seven-year follow-up after dobutamine stress echocardiography: impact of gender on prognosis.多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图检查后七年随访:性别对预后的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jan 4;45(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.048.
7
A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry.一种适用于所有形式急性冠状动脉综合征的经过验证的预测模型:在一项国际登记研究中评估出院后6个月死亡风险
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2727-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2727.
8
The prognostic value of ECG-gated SPECT imaging in patients undergoing stress Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging.心电图门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描成像在接受负荷锝-99m 甲氧基异丁基异腈心肌灌注成像患者中的预后价值。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2004 May-Jun;11(3):253-62. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.02.005.
9
The prognostic value of markers of inflammation in patients with troponin T-negative chest pain before discharge from the emergency department.急诊科出院前肌钙蛋白T阴性胸痛患者炎症标志物的预后价值
Am J Med. 2003 Nov;115(7):521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.08.006.
10
Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events.全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究中院内死亡的预测因素。
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 27;163(19):2345-53. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345.