• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管道错接:规范的偏差。

Tubing misconnections: normalization of deviance.

机构信息

1Texas Woman’s University, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Clin Pract. 2011 Jun;26(3):286-93. doi: 10.1177/0884533611406134.

DOI:10.1177/0884533611406134
PMID:21586413
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accidental connection of an enteral system to an intravenous (IV) system frequently results in the death of the patient. Misconnections are commonly attributed to the presence of universal connectors found in the majority of patient care tubing systems. Universal connectors allow for tubing misconnections between physiologically incompatible systems.

METHODS

The purpose of this review of case studies of tubing misconnections and of current expert recommendations for safe tubing connections was to answer the following questions: In tubing connections that have the potential for misconnections between enteral and IV tubing, what are the threats to safety? What are patient outcomes following misconnections between enteral and IV tubing? What are the current recommendations for preventing misconnections between enteral and IV tubing? Following an extensive literature search and guided by 2 models of threats and errors, the authors analyzed case studies and expert opinions to identify technical, organizational, and human errors; patient-related threats; patient outcomes; and recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 116 case studies were found in 34 publications. Each involved misconnections of tubes carrying feedings, intended for enteral routes, to IV lines. Overwhelmingly, the recommendations were for redesign to eliminate universal connectors and prevent misconnections. Other recommendations were made, but the analysis indicates they would not prevent all misconnections.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of the published case studies and current expert recommendations supports a redesign of connectors to ensure incompatibility between enteral and IV systems. Despite the cumulative evidence, little progress has been made to safeguard patients from tubing misconnections.

摘要

背景

肠内系统意外连接到静脉(IV)系统通常会导致患者死亡。连接错误通常归因于大多数患者护理管系统中存在通用连接器。通用连接器允许在生理不相容的系统之间进行管连接错误。

方法

本研究回顾了管连接错误的案例研究以及当前安全管连接的专家建议,旨在回答以下问题:在有肠内和 IV 管之间连接错误的可能性的管连接中,存在哪些安全威胁?肠内和 IV 管之间连接错误后患者的结局如何?目前有哪些预防肠内和 IV 管之间连接错误的建议?经过广泛的文献检索,并根据威胁和错误的 2 个模型,作者分析了案例研究和专家意见,以确定技术、组织和人为错误;患者相关威胁;患者结局;和建议。

结果

在 34 篇出版物中发现了总共 116 个案例研究。每个案例都涉及将用于肠内途径的输送管误接到 IV 线上。压倒性的建议是重新设计以消除通用连接器并防止连接错误。还提出了其他建议,但分析表明它们无法防止所有的连接错误。

结论

对已发表的案例研究和当前专家建议的审查支持重新设计连接器,以确保肠内和 IV 系统之间不兼容。尽管有累积证据,但在保护患者免受管连接错误方面几乎没有取得进展。

相似文献

1
Tubing misconnections: normalization of deviance.管道错接:规范的偏差。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2011 Jun;26(3):286-93. doi: 10.1177/0884533611406134.
2
Enteral feeding misconnections: an update.肠内营养误连接:最新进展
Nutr Clin Pract. 2009 Jun-Jul;24(3):325-34. doi: 10.1177/0884533609335174.
3
Tubing misconnections: a perilous design flaw.
Mater Manag Health Care. 2006 Nov;15(11):36-9.
4
Parks Medical to redesign vascular laboratory system pressure/cuff tubing connectors to prevent misconnections.帕克斯医疗公司将重新设计血管实验室系统的压力/袖带管路连接器,以防止误连接。
Health Devices. 2012 Jul;41(7):230-1.
5
Tubing misconnections--a persistent and potentially deadly occurrence.
Sentinel Event Alert. 2006 Apr 3(36):1-3.
6
The lingering safety menace: A 10-year review of enteral misconnection adverse events and narrative review.遗留的安全隐患:肠内误连接不良事件的 10 年回顾和叙述性评论。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2024 Oct;39(5):1251-1258. doi: 10.1002/ncp.11191. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
7
FDA updates tubing misconnections website.
Health Devices. 2012 Oct;41(10):334.
8
Preventing catheter/tubing misconnections: much needed help is on the way!
Alta RN. 2011 Mar-Apr;67(2):24-5.
9
Enteral feeding misconnections in the NICU: a continuing patient safety threat.新生儿重症监护病房中的肠内喂养误连接:持续存在的患者安全威胁。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Dec;13(6):447-53. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000032.
10
ISMP releases self-assessment tool for tubing misconnections.安全用药实践协会发布了输液管误连自我评估工具。
Health Devices. 2012 Nov;41(11):369.

引用本文的文献

1
[User behavior during functional testing of the ventilator: analysis of the use of the QUICKcheck and detection of misconnected ventilation tubes].[呼吸机功能测试期间的用户行为:QUICKcheck 的使用分析及通气管道误连接检测]
Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Feb;74(2):72-80. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01496-0. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Devices for securing and administering pediatric compounded oral liquids: survey results from French university hospitals.保障和管理儿科复方口服液体的设备:法国大学附属医院的调查结果。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jun;183(6):2805-2810. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05547-x. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Synthesis of research on ENFit gastrostomy tubes with potential implications for US patients using these devices.
使用这些器械的美国患者相关的 ENFit 胃造口管的潜在影响的研究综述。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;37(4):752-761. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10829. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
4
Assessing dosing errors in legacy and low dose tip ENFit syringes.评估legacy 和低剂量 tip ENFit 注射器中的给药错误。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Feb;47(2):218-227. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13559. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
Compatibility and Safety Implications Associated with Interfacing Medical Devices in Neonatal Respiratory Care: A Case Example Using the Inhaled Nitric Oxide Delivery System.新生儿呼吸护理中医疗设备连接的兼容性和安全影响:以吸入一氧化氮输送系统为例
Med Devices (Auckl). 2021 Feb 17;14:27-35. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S268477. eCollection 2021.
6
Neuraxial and peripheral misconnection events leading to wrong-route medication errors: a comprehensive literature review.导致错误途径用药错误的神经轴和外周连接错误事件:全面文献回顾。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Feb;46(2):176-181. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101836. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
7
Comparison of Syringe Compression Force Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes.ENFit 和 legacy 喂养管的注射器压缩力比较。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 Jan;43(1):107-117. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1174. Epub 2018 May 30.