Suppr超能文献

50例泰国输血依赖型地中海贫血患者心脏T2*分析中基于区域和逐像素方法的比较。

Comparison of the region-based and pixel-wise methods for cardiac T2* analysis in 50 transfusion-dependent Thai thalassemia patients.

作者信息

Saiviroonporn Pairash, Viprakasit Vip, Boonyasirinant Thananya, Khuhapinant Archrob, Wood John C, Krittayaphong Rungroj

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 May-Jun;35(3):375-81. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31820eaaf2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the observer variability of the conventional region-based (RB) to the typical and proposed pixel-wise (PW) methods for cardiac T2* analysis in thalassemia patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty thalassemia major patients were enrolled for the study. Short-axis bright- and black-blood sequences were acquired and analyzed using the RB and PW methods. Regions were defined using the whole septum (WS) or partial septum (PS). From the same PS region, results were reported by mean (PS-PW) and median (MPS-PW). Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were investigated on all data set by 2 independent observers blinded to the result.

RESULTS

The T2* values from the PS-PW and MPS-PW methods were comparable to the conventional WS-RB method on both scanning techniques. When comparing the interobserver variability from the WS-RB to the PS-PW method, the coefficient of variation of the PS-PW method was equivalent (4.5% vs 4.7%, P = NS) for the bright-blood technique but 31% lower (4.0% vs 2.8%, P = 0.21) for the black-blood technique. The proposed MPS-PW method performed even better with respect to the conventional WS-RB method, decreasing interobserver coefficient of variation by 24% (4.5% vs 3.5%, P = 0.08) and 42% (4.0% vs 2.4%, P = 0.02), respectively. Intraobserver reproducibility followed the same trend.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed PW method using the median of T2* values calculated from partial interventricular septum region provided lower intraobserver and interobserver variabilities compared with the conventional RB or typical PW methods.

摘要

目的

比较地中海贫血患者心脏T2*分析中传统基于区域(RB)方法与典型及提议的逐像素(PW)方法的观察者变异性。

设计与方法

招募50例重型地中海贫血患者进行研究。采集短轴亮血和黑血序列,并使用RB和PW方法进行分析。使用全间隔(WS)或部分间隔(PS)定义区域。从相同的PS区域,结果以平均值(PS-PW)和中位数(MPS-PW)报告。由2名对结果不知情的独立观察者对所有数据集进行观察者内和观察者间变异性研究。

结果

在两种扫描技术上,PS-PW和MPS-PW方法的T2*值与传统的WS-RB方法相当。当比较从WS-RB到PS-PW方法的观察者间变异性时,对于亮血技术,PS-PW方法的变异系数相当(4.5%对4.7%,P=无显著性差异),但对于黑血技术则低31%(4.0%对2.8%,P=0.21)。提议的MPS-PW方法相对于传统的WS-RB方法表现更好,观察者间变异系数分别降低了24%(4.5%对3.5%,P=0.08)和42%(4.0%对2.4%,P=0.02)。观察者内再现性遵循相同趋势。

结论

与传统的RB或典型的PW方法相比,提议的使用从部分室间隔区域计算的T2*值中位数的PW方法具有更低的观察者内和观察者间变异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验