Gurunluoglu Raffi, Shafighi Maziar, Williams Susan A, Glasgow Mark
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, CO 80204, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Jan;68(1):37-42. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182110fce.
To reconstruct a forehead defect, a plastic surgeon must be knowledgeable about the neural, vascular, and muscular anatomy. The position of fixed structures such as eyebrows and hairline should be respected. For the past 5 years, we have used double hatchet flaps for reconstruction of relatively large supra-eyebrow and forehead defects. Because this flap does not appear to be among the techniques used by young plastic surgeons, we thought that it would be valuable to report our experience.
Supra-eyebrow and forehead defects ranging from 2.5 × 2.5 cm to 3.5 × 3.5 cm were reconstructed using double hatchet flaps in 10 patients. Pearls and pitfalls of the technique are discussed along with the presentation of 3 cases.
The reconstructions were uneventful and the flaps were highly viable in all patients. There was no significant distortion in the eyebrow or hairline due to reconstruction in any of the patients. All the flaps were sensate. A mild anesthesia in the distribution of supraorbital/trochlear nerve proximal to the flaps was noted only in 3 patients. This was associated with inevitable nerve damage during excision of malignant skin lesions and/or flap dissection. No recurrence was noted during the follow-up period which ranged from 6 to 36 months (mean, 13.5 months). Overall patient satisfaction score based on scar appearance and perceived degree of forehead anesthesia was 3 (neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) in 1 patient, was 4 (somewhat satisfied) in 4 patients, and was 5 (very satisfied) in 5 patients.
Hatchet flaps have similar color and texture to that of the adjacent supra-eyebrow and forehead defects. The scarring is acceptable with reliable and reproducible results. Oftentimes, sensory nerve branches can be preserved with careful planning and tedious dissection. This type of reconstruction should be considered in the armamentarium of supra-eyebrow and forehead defects.
为了修复前额缺损,整形外科医生必须熟悉神经、血管和肌肉的解剖结构。应尊重眉毛和发际线等固定结构的位置。在过去5年里,我们使用双斧形皮瓣修复相对较大的眉上和前额缺损。由于这种皮瓣似乎不在年轻整形外科医生常用的技术之列,我们认为报告我们的经验会很有价值。
10例患者使用双斧形皮瓣修复2.5×2.5 cm至3.5×3.5 cm的眉上和前额缺损。讨论了该技术的要点和陷阱,并展示了3个病例。
所有患者的修复过程均顺利,皮瓣成活率高。所有患者均未因修复导致眉毛或发际线出现明显变形。所有皮瓣均有感觉。仅3例患者在皮瓣近端的眶上/滑车神经分布区域出现轻度麻木。这与切除恶性皮肤病变和/或皮瓣分离过程中不可避免的神经损伤有关。随访6至36个月(平均13.5个月)期间未发现复发。基于瘢痕外观和前额麻木感的总体患者满意度评分,1例患者为3分(既不满意也不不满意),4例患者为4分( somewhat满意),5例患者为5分(非常满意)。
斧形皮瓣的颜色和质地与相邻的眉上和前额缺损相似。瘢痕可接受,结果可靠且可重复。通常,通过精心规划和细致分离可保留感觉神经分支。在眉上和前额缺损的修复方法中应考虑这种重建方式。