Department of Pacific and Asian Studies, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Med Anthropol. 2011 May;30(3):319-38. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2011.560585.
A critical feature of contemporary interventions of HIV is the provision of voluntary counseling and testing. Protecting the confidentiality of the client is a lynchpin of successful counseling. This article explores the teaching and implementation of the concept of confidentiality in highlands Papua, Eastern Indonesia. Results of participant observation and in-depth interviews with clinic staff in 2009 and 2010 show that confidentiality is an ideal poorly taught and systematically violated in practice. Identifying, labeling, and regulating HIV-positive persons appears more important than enacting the humanitarian and moral imperative of protecting client rights. Confidentiality becomes the means to enact dividing practices and to create categories of persons-those who choose to adhere to therapies and those who do not. The implications of this pattern are discussed with reference to wider humanitarian initiatives.
当代艾滋病干预的一个关键特点是提供自愿咨询和检测。保护客户的机密性是成功咨询的关键。本文探讨了在印度尼西亚东部高地巴布亚地区教授和实施保密概念的情况。2009 年和 2010 年对诊所工作人员进行的参与式观察和深入访谈的结果表明,保密性是一个理想的概念,在实践中教授得很差,而且系统地被违反。识别、标记和规范艾滋病毒阳性者似乎比执行保护客户权利的人道主义和道德命令更为重要。保密性成为实施划分做法和创建人员类别的手段——那些选择坚持治疗的人和那些不坚持治疗的人。本文还讨论了这种模式对更广泛的人道主义倡议的影响。