Williams Richard A J, Xiao Xiang-Ming, Peterson A Townsend
Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas,1345 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Geospat Health. 2011 May;5(2):247-53. doi: 10.4081/gh.2011.177.
The highly pathogenic avian influenza strain H5N1 was first detected in Europe in 2005, and has since been documented continent-wide in wild birds and poultry. However, the relative roles of each host group in transmission remain contentious. Using recently developed tools for analysis of ecological niches and geographic distributions of species, we compared ecological niche requirements for H5N1 between paired host groups (poultry versus wild birds, Anseriformes versus Falconiformes, swans versus non-swan Anseriformes). If environmental signals of different host groups are significantly different, the groups are likely to be involved in distinct transmission cycles. In contrast, models for which similarity cannot be rejected imply no unique ecological niches and no potential linkage of transmission cycles. In 24 similarity tests, we found significant similarity (13/24) or no significant differences (9/24). Although 2 of the 24 analyses showed significant differences, neither was unequivocal, so we conclude an overall signal of niche similarity among groups. We thus could not document distinct ecological niches for H5N1 occurrences in different host groups and conclude that the transmission cycles are broadly interwoven.
高致病性禽流感病毒H5N1于2005年首次在欧洲被发现,此后在整个欧洲大陆的野生鸟类和家禽中都有记录。然而,每个宿主群体在传播中的相对作用仍存在争议。我们使用最近开发的用于分析物种生态位和地理分布的工具,比较了配对宿主群体(家禽与野生鸟类、雁形目与隼形目、天鹅与非天鹅雁形目)之间H5N1的生态位需求。如果不同宿主群体的环境信号存在显著差异,那么这些群体可能参与不同的传播循环。相反,不能拒绝相似性的模型意味着没有独特的生态位,也没有传播循环的潜在联系。在24次相似性测试中,我们发现了显著的相似性(13/24)或无显著差异(9/24)。虽然24次分析中有2次显示出显著差异,但都不明确,因此我们得出各群体之间存在生态位相似性的总体信号。因此,我们无法证明H5N1在不同宿主群体中的出现具有独特的生态位,并得出传播循环广泛交织的结论。