Suppr超能文献

乳腺扩散加权 MRI:四面体与正交扩散敏感对比在肿块病变检测和定位中的比较。

Breast diffusion-weighted MRI: comparison of tetrahedral versus orthogonal diffusion sensitization for detection and localization of mass lesions.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun;33(6):1375-81. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22560.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential of tetrahedral diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) compared to orthogonal DWI for detection and localization of early enhanced breast mass lesions at 1.5T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven consecutive patients (mean age 51.7 years, range 14-84 years) with 68 solitary early enhanced breast lesions suspicious for cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently observed maximum intensity projection images of orthogonal and tetrahedral DWI and the diagnostic accuracy and background tissue visibility between two DWI techniques were compared. Contrast-enhanced MRI was used as the reference standard. Background tissue visibility was assessed based on whether the "breast quadrant" and "skin line" were determined. A phantom validation study for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values was also conducted.

RESULTS

Sensitivity (93%) and specificity (96%) on tetrahedral DWI were equivalent to those on orthogonal DWI (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 95%). Background tissue was more easily determined with tetrahedral DWI (breast quadrant, 90%; skin lines, 95%) than with orthogonal DWI (breast quadrant, 61%; skin lines, 16%). ADC values of tetrahedral DWI were highly correlated with those of orthogonal DWI.

CONCLUSION

Tetrahedral DWI provided equivalent detectability of mass lesions with improved visibility of surrounding anatomical structure.

摘要

目的

评估在 1.5T 下四面体扩散加权成像(DWI)与正交 DWI 相比检测和定位早期强化乳腺肿块病变的潜力。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 67 例连续患者(平均年龄 51.7 岁,范围 14-84 岁),这些患者在动态对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)上均有 68 个可疑为癌症的孤立性早期强化乳腺肿块。两位放射科医生分别观察了正交和四面体 DWI 的最大强度投影图像,并比较了两种 DWI 技术的诊断准确性和背景组织可视性。对比增强 MRI 被用作参考标准。背景组织可视性是根据是否可以确定“乳房象限”和“皮肤线”来评估的。还进行了表观扩散系数(ADC)值的体模验证研究。

结果

在四面体 DWI 上的灵敏度(93%)和特异性(96%)与正交 DWI 相当(灵敏度,88%;特异性,95%)。与正交 DWI 相比,四面体 DWI 更容易确定背景组织(乳房象限,90%;皮肤线,95%)。四面体 DWI 的 ADC 值与正交 DWI 高度相关。

结论

四面体 DWI 提供了与正交 DWI 相当的肿块病变检测能力,同时改善了周围解剖结构的可视性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验