• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过邮寄自我采集试剂盒提高沙眼衣原体复查率。

Improving Chlamydia trachomatis retesting rates by mailed self-collection kit.

作者信息

Buhrer-Skinner Monika, Muller Reinhold, Buettner Petra G, Gordon Rose, Debattista Joseph

机构信息

Anton Breinl Centre for Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

出版信息

Sex Health. 2011 Jun;8(2):248-50. doi: 10.1071/SH10064.

DOI:10.1071/SH10064
PMID:21592441
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess a mailed self-collection kit for chlamydia testing as an intervention to increase post-treatment retesting rates.

METHODS

This prospective intervention study took place at a sexual health clinic in Townsville, North Queensland (Australia) between 2006 and 2008. The intervention consisted of offering to mail a self-collection kit for retesting 3 months after treatment. The achieved retesting rates were compared to those from the previous year and to concurrent controls who did not participate in the intervention. Both control groups received standard advice on retesting.

RESULTS

Of the 46 participants in the intervention group, 34.8% returned the sample for retesting 3 to 4 months after initial treatment, in comparison to 6.8% of the historic control groups (n=206) and 1.4% of the concurrent control group (n=142) (P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Retesting rates for Chlamydia trachomatis were substantially and significantly improved using the mailed self-collection kit evidencing that the kit could deliver a much needed intervention to improve notoriously low retesting rates.

摘要

背景

评估用于衣原体检测的邮寄式自我采样试剂盒,作为提高治疗后复查率的一种干预措施。

方法

这项前瞻性干预研究于2006年至2008年在澳大利亚北昆士兰汤斯维尔的一家性健康诊所进行。干预措施包括在治疗3个月后提供邮寄式自我采样试剂盒用于复查。将实际复查率与上一年的复查率以及未参与干预的同期对照组的复查率进行比较。两个对照组均接受了关于复查的标准建议。

结果

干预组的46名参与者中,34.8%在初次治疗3至4个月后返还样本进行复查,相比之下,历史对照组(n = 206)的复查率为6.8%,同期对照组(n = 142)的复查率为1.4%(P均<0.001)。

结论

使用邮寄式自我采样试剂盒可显著提高沙眼衣原体的复查率,这表明该试剂盒能够提供一项急需的干预措施,以改善一直很低的复查率。

相似文献

1
Improving Chlamydia trachomatis retesting rates by mailed self-collection kit.通过邮寄自我采集试剂盒提高沙眼衣原体复查率。
Sex Health. 2011 Jun;8(2):248-50. doi: 10.1071/SH10064.
2
The check is in the mail: piloting a novel approach to Chlamydia trachomatis testing using self-collected, mailed specimen.支票已寄出:试用一种采用自行采集并邮寄样本的新型沙眼衣原体检测方法。
Sex Health. 2009 Jun;6(2):163-9. doi: 10.1071/SH08076.
3
Internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to reach non-clinic populations with mailed self-administered vaginal swabs.基于互联网的沙眼衣原体筛查,通过邮寄自行采集的阴道拭子,覆盖非诊所人群。
Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jul;33(7):451-7. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000200497.14326.fb.
4
The C-project: use of self-collection kits to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis in young people in a community-based health promotion project.C项目:在一个基于社区的健康促进项目中,使用自我采集试剂盒对年轻人进行沙眼衣原体筛查。
Sex Health. 2009 Jun;6(2):157-62. doi: 10.1071/SH08039.
5
A trial of the distribution of chlamydia self-collection postal specimen kits from Australian community pharmacies.一项关于在澳大利亚社区药房分发衣原体自我采集邮政标本试剂盒的试验。
Sex Health. 2011 Mar;8(1):130-2. doi: 10.1071/SH10068.
6
Poor uptake of self-sample collection kits for Chlamydia testing outside primary care.衣原体检测用自我采样试剂盒在初级保健之外的使用率低。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Oct;34(5):517-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00600.x.
7
The acceptability and cost of a home-based chlamydia retesting strategy: findings from the REACT randomised controlled trial.基于家庭的衣原体重新检测策略的可接受性和成本:来自REACT随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 28;16:83. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2727-4.
8
Retesting for genital Chlamydia trachomatis among visitors of a sexually transmitted infections clinic: randomized intervention trial of home- versus clinic-based recall.对性传播感染门诊就诊者进行生殖道沙眼衣原体的重复检测:家庭与门诊为基础的召回比较的随机干预试验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 May 24;13:239. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-239.
9
[Assessment of the commercial home Chlamydia test].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Oct 9;168(41):3540.
10
Audit of Postal Test Kits in Edinburgh for Chlamydia trachomatis as an alternative to genitourinary medicine clinic attendance.爱丁堡衣原体邮政检测试剂盒审计:作为替代泌尿生殖医学门诊就诊的方式
Int J STD AIDS. 2007 May;18(5):349-50. doi: 10.1258/095646207780749718.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal Patterns in Chlamydia Repeat Testing in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州衣原体重复检测的时间模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):458-463. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.006.
2
Home-based versus clinic-based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌感染管理中家庭样本采集与门诊样本采集的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;2015(9):CD011317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011317.pub2.