Veldhuijzen Nienke J, Ingabire Chantal, Luchters Stanley, Bosire Wilkister, Braunstein Sarah, Chersich Matthew, van de Wijgert Janneke
Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sex Health. 2011 Jun;8(2):251-4. doi: 10.1071/SH10047.
Epidemiological and HIV prevention studies in sub-Saharan Africa have almost exclusively focussed on vaginal transmission of HIV, the primary mode of transmission in the region. Little is known about the prevalence of heterosexual anal intercourse (AI), its correlates and its role in the spread of HIV. Prevention messaging seldom, if ever, includes AI.
Sexual and other risk behaviours (including frequency of AI) were assessed in two cross-sectional surveys of female sex workers (FSW) in Kigali, Rwanda (n=800) and Mombasa, Kenya (n=820). In addition, a subset of FSW surveyed in Kigali attended seven focus group discussions and four in-depth interviews.
AI was reported by 5.5% and 4.3% of FSW in the cross-sectional surveys, in Kigali and Mombasa, respectively. FSW practising AI reported multiple risk factors for HIV transmission: inconsistent condom use (odds ratio (OR) Kigali 5.9 (95% CI 1.4-24.7); OR Mombasa 2.1 (1.1-4.2)); more than five sexual partners in the past week (OR Kigali 4.3 (1.5-12.4); OR Mombasa 2.2 (1.1-4.3)); alcohol use before sex (OR Kigali 2.8 (1.4-5.8)); more than 5 years of female sex work (OR Mombasa 2.4 (1.2-4.9)); and history of genital symptoms in the past year (OR Mombasa 3.6 (1.7-7.9)). AI was, however, not associated with HIV prevalence (OR Kigali 0.9 (0.5-1.9); OR Mombasa 0.5 (0.2-1.2)). Negative connotations and stigma associated with AI were expressed during qualitative interviews.
AI was associated with several indicators of sexual risk behaviour. Prevalence of AI was probably underreported due to social desirability bias. Stigma associated with AI poses methodological challenges in obtaining valid data.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区的流行病学和艾滋病预防研究几乎都只聚焦于艾滋病的阴道传播,这是该地区主要的传播方式。对于异性肛交(AI)的流行情况、相关因素及其在艾滋病传播中的作用,人们知之甚少。预防宣传信息中很少(几乎没有)涉及AI。
在卢旺达基加利(n = 800)和肯尼亚蒙巴萨(n = 820)对女性性工作者(FSW)进行的两项横断面调查中,评估了性行为及其他风险行为(包括AI的频率)。此外,在基加利接受调查的一部分FSW参加了七次焦点小组讨论和四次深入访谈。
在横断面调查中,基加利和蒙巴萨分别有5.5%和4.3%的FSW报告有AI行为。有AI行为的FSW报告了多种艾滋病传播的风险因素:避孕套使用不规范(基加利的比值比(OR)为5.9(95%置信区间1.4 - 24.7);蒙巴萨的OR为2.1(1.1 - 4.2));过去一周内有超过五个性伴侣(基加利的OR为4.3(1.5 - 12.4);蒙巴萨的OR为2.2(1.1 - 4.3));性行为前饮酒(基加利的OR为2.8(1.4 - 5.));从事女性性工作超过5年(蒙巴萨的OR为2.4(1.2 - 4.9));以及过去一年有生殖器症状史(蒙巴萨的OR为3.6(1.7 - 7.9))。然而,AI与艾滋病感染率无关(基加利的OR为0.9(0.5 - 1.9);蒙巴萨的OR为0.5(0.2 - 1.2))。在定性访谈中表达了与AI相关的负面含义和污名化。
AI与多种性风险行为指标相关。由于社会期望偏差,AI的流行率可能被低估。与AI相关的污名化在获取有效数据方面带来了方法学上的挑战。