Bourel-Ponchel E, Le Moing A-G, Delignières A, De Broca A, Wallois F, Berquin P
Service de neuropédiatrie, hôpital Nord, CHU d'Amiens, place Victor-Pauchet, 80054 Amiens cedex, France.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2011 Aug-Sep;167(8-9):592-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 May 17.
Among the epileptic syndromes occurring during infancy, which are mostly non-idiopathic and associated with a poor prognosis, benign infantile convulsions are characterized by a favourable evolution. This work aims to analyse and compare the clinical, EEG and outcome characteristics of familial benign infantile convulsions (FBIC) and non-familial benign infantile convulsions (NFBIC). This is a retrospective study, conducted between 1988 and 2008, in 40 infants who presented benign infantile seizures during the two first years of life. All of them had no personal history, normal psychomotor development, normal neurological examinations, no abnormalities on biological and radiological investigations and a favourable outcome. In 14 cases, there was a familial history of familial benign infantile convulsions. However, among the 26 cases with non-familial benign infantile convulsions, 11 children had a familial history of other epileptic syndrome. That may suggest a genetic familial susceptibility. In the two groups, the clinical features and the electroencephalography were similar. The seizures had short duration and occurred most often in clusters. Twenty-nine children had secondarily generalized partial seizures and 11 infants had generalized seizures but a focal onset cannot be excluded. The antiepileptic drugs allowed rapid resolution of seizures. One child necessitated a prolonged antiepileptic treatment. In the other cases, seizures cured in the first year without recurrence of seizures after treatment discontinuation. The evolution was characterised in five children by a later occurrence of dystonia. This subgroup was described as infantile convulsion and choreoathetosis syndrome (ICCA). Benign infantile convulsions are probably an underestimated epileptic syndrome. The diagnosis is relatively easy in the familial forms with dominant autosomal transmission. In contrast, in sporadic forms, the diagnosis can be confirmed only by the evolution. The good prognosis must be tempered by the subsequent onset of dystonia consisted in the ICCA syndrome and justifies a prolonged follow-up.
在婴儿期出现的癫痫综合征中,大多数为非特发性且预后不良,而良性婴儿惊厥的特点是病情发展良好。本研究旨在分析和比较家族性良性婴儿惊厥(FBIC)和非家族性良性婴儿惊厥(NFBIC)的临床、脑电图及预后特征。这是一项回顾性研究,于1988年至2008年对40例在生命最初两年出现良性婴儿惊厥的婴儿进行。所有患儿均无个人病史,精神运动发育正常,神经系统检查正常,生物学和放射学检查无异常且预后良好。14例有家族性良性婴儿惊厥家族史。然而,在26例非家族性良性婴儿惊厥患儿中,11例有其他癫痫综合征家族史。这可能提示存在遗传家族易感性。两组的临床特征和脑电图相似。惊厥持续时间短,最常成簇发作。29例患儿有继发性全身性部分性发作,11例婴儿有全身性发作,但不能排除局灶性起病。抗癫痫药物可使惊厥迅速缓解。1例患儿需要长期抗癫痫治疗。在其他病例中,惊厥在第一年治愈,停药后未复发。5例患儿病情发展为后期出现肌张力障碍。该亚组被描述为婴儿惊厥和舞蹈手足徐动症综合征(ICCA)。良性婴儿惊厥可能是一种被低估的癫痫综合征。在常染色体显性遗传的家族性形式中诊断相对容易。相比之下,在散发性形式中,只有通过病情发展才能确诊。ICCA综合征中随后出现的肌张力障碍必须缓和对良好预后的判断,并证明需要长期随访。