Suppr超能文献

在没有肾血管夹闭的猪模型中,使用单一器械进行腹腔镜部分肾切除术的止血控制。

Single instrument for hemostatic control in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a porcine model without renal vascular clamping.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):1005-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0557. Epub 2011 May 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To test the viability of a new device to obtain hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) without vascular clamping.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comparative experimental study between a new radiofrequency (RF)-assisted device consisting of a handheld instrument that simultaneously conducts coagulation and cutting tasks without hilar clamping vs a standard technique with hilar clamping. A porcine model was used (10 animals per group) with survival of 17 days.

RESULTS

The estimated blood loss with the new device was significantly lower than with the standard technique (15.5±23.7 vs 79.4±76.3  mL). Although transection time was longer with the new device (10.7±13.7 vs 2.1±1.2  min), the total operative time was significantly shorter (35.3±13.7 vs 60.2±10.5  min). Evidence of localized urinary extravasation (urinoma) was identical in both groups (five cases). The group subjected to the new device, however, showed a significantly higher number of cases of leakage after conducting the methylene-blue test: eight (80%) cases vs only one (11%) with the standard technique. Necrosis depth was significantly greater with the new device (6.6±0.9 vs <1  mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The experimental results suggest that the proposed RF-assisted device provides adequate hemostatic control during transection of the renal parenchyma without additional instruments or surgical maneuvers and could therefore be a valuable adjunct for LPN without vascular clamping. The device was unsuccessful in effectively sealing the collecting system.

摘要

目的

测试一种新设备在腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)中实现止血而无需血管夹闭的可行性,该设备通过射频(RF)辅助,无需夹持肾蒂即可同时进行凝血和切割操作。

材料与方法

我们进行了一项新设备与标准技术的对比实验研究,前者为一种手持式仪器,包含同时进行凝血和切割任务的功能,无需夹持肾蒂;后者为标准技术,采用夹持肾蒂的方法。该实验使用了猪模型(每组 10 只动物),存活时间为 17 天。

结果

与标准技术相比,新设备的估计失血量明显更低(15.5±23.7 与 79.4±76.3  mL)。虽然新设备的切割时间更长(10.7±13.7 与 2.1±1.2  min),但总手术时间明显更短(35.3±13.7 与 60.2±10.5  min)。两组均出现 5 例局部尿外渗(尿囊肿)。然而,在用亚甲蓝试验检测后,使用新设备的组中,漏尿的病例数明显更多:8 例(80%)与仅 1 例(11%),使用标准技术。新设备的组织坏死深度明显更深(6.6±0.9 与 <1  mm)。

结论

实验结果表明,所提出的 RF 辅助设备在不使用额外器械或手术操作的情况下,可在肾实质切割过程中提供充分的止血控制,因此可能成为无血管夹闭的 LPN 的一种有价值的辅助手段。该设备在有效密封集合系统方面效果不佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验