Johnson Michael W, Stoll Lisa, Rubio Ana, Troncoso Juan, Pletnikova Olga, Fowler David R, Li Ling
Office of Chief Medical Examiner (OCME), Urban County Government Center, Louisville, KY, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Sep;56(5):1198-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01814.x. Epub 2011 May 19.
We tested the independent utility of β-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP) immunohistochemical staining as evidence of brain trauma in the deaths of young children. Blinded reviewers retrospectively reviewed immunostained brain tissues from homicidal deaths, age-matched control cases without evidence of trauma, as well as cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The reviewers correctly identified five of the seven cases with documented inflicted head trauma. However, one of seven age-matched control cases and one of 10 SIDS/sudden unexplained death in infancy (SUDI) cases demonstrated staining patterns similar to those seen in cases of inflicted trauma. We discuss these cases and the circumstances surrounding them with the intent to explain the difficulties associated with immunohistological interpretation of axonal injury. Although the utility of β-APP is quite powerful if not confounded by global hypoxic-ischemic injury, ultimately, β-APP studies should be only one piece of information in the determination of cause and manner of death.
我们测试了β-淀粉样前体蛋白(β-APP)免疫组化染色作为幼儿死亡中脑外伤证据的独立效用。盲法评审员回顾性地审查了来自凶杀死亡、无外伤证据的年龄匹配对照病例以及婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)病例的免疫染色脑组织。评审员正确识别出了七例有记录的头部受虐创伤病例中的五例。然而,七例年龄匹配对照病例中有一例,十例SIDS/婴儿不明原因猝死(SUDI)病例中有一例显示出与受虐创伤病例相似的染色模式。我们讨论了这些病例及其周围情况,旨在解释与轴突损伤免疫组织学解释相关的困难。尽管如果不受全身性缺氧缺血性损伤的干扰,β-APP的效用相当强大,但最终,β-APP研究在确定死亡原因和方式时应只是其中一项信息。