CHU Montpellier, Neuroradiology, Av Augstin Fliche, Montpellier, France.
Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):1929-35. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608976. Epub 2011 May 19.
Large vessel occlusion in ischemic stroke is associated with a high degree of morbidity. When intravenous thrombolysis fails, mechanical thrombectomy can provide an alternative and synergistic method for flow restoration. In this study we evaluate the safety and efficacy of our stroke management protocol (RECOST study).
Fifty consecutive ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion were included. After clinical and MRI imaging assessment, 3 treatment strategies were selected according to time of symptom onset and location of vessel occlusion: rescue therapy; combined therapy; and stand-alone thrombectomy (RECOST study). MRI ASPECT score <5 was the main exclusion criterion. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed exclusively with the Solitaire flow restoration device. Clinical outcome was assessed after treatment, on day 1, and at discharge.
Mean patient age was 67.6 years, mean NIHSS score was 14.7, and mean ASPECT score was 6 on presentation. Vessel occlusions were in the middle cerebral artery (40%), the internal carotid artery (28%), and the basilar artery (32%). Rescue treatment represented 24%, combined therapy represented 56%, and stand-alone thrombectomy represented 20%. Mean recanalization time from symptoms onset was 377 minutes, with overall recanalization rate TICI 3 of 84%. NIHSS score at discharge was 6.5, with 60% of patients demonstrating NIHSS score 0 to 1 or an improvement of >9 points. Symptomatic complication rate was 10%. At 3 months, 54% of patients had a modififed Rankin scale score of 0 to 2, with an overall mortality rate of 12%.
The present integrated stroke management protocol (RECOST study) demonstrated rapid, safe, and effective recanalization. We postulate that the Solitaire device contributed to high recanalization and patient selection using MRI ASPECT score to low and complication rates, therefore avoiding futile and dangerous interventions.
缺血性脑卒中的大血管闭塞与高发病率相关。当静脉溶栓治疗失败时,机械取栓可以提供一种替代和协同的血流恢复方法。本研究评估了我们的卒中管理方案(RECOST 研究)的安全性和有效性。
纳入 50 例连续的大血管闭塞缺血性卒中患者。经过临床和 MRI 影像学评估,根据症状发作时间和血管闭塞部位选择 3 种治疗策略:挽救性治疗;联合治疗;单独取栓(RECOST 研究)。主要排除标准为 MRI ASPECT 评分<5。机械取栓仅采用 Solitaire 血流重建装置进行。治疗后、第 1 天和出院时评估临床结局。
患者平均年龄为 67.6 岁,平均 NIHSS 评分为 14.7,发病时平均 ASPECT 评分为 6。血管闭塞部位为大脑中动脉(40%)、颈内动脉(28%)和基底动脉(32%)。挽救性治疗占 24%,联合治疗占 56%,单独取栓占 20%。从症状发作到再通的平均时间为 377 分钟,整体再通率 TICI 3 为 84%。出院时 NIHSS 评分为 6.5,60%的患者 NIHSS 评分 0 至 1 分或改善>9 分。症状性并发症发生率为 10%。3 个月时,54%的患者改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0 至 2 分,总死亡率为 12%。
本研究中整合的卒中管理方案(RECOST 研究)显示出快速、安全、有效的再通效果。我们推测 Solitaire 装置通过 MRI ASPECT 评分选择低风险患者,从而避免无效和危险的干预,这有助于提高再通率和降低患者并发症发生率。