Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: BICC, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33:7-19. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr001. Epub 2011 May 19.
Infection with human immunodeficiency virus remains a major public health problem in the United States. Prominent guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention differ in their recommendations on whether and how to screen adults and adolescents not known to be at higher risk. These discrepancies have led to controversy and debate as well as confusion among clinicians. This article reviews principles of screening, explains specific issues related to screening for human immunodeficiency virus, reviews the discrepancies between the US Preventive Services Task Force and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and the methods used in each guideline, and describes potential reasons for the discrepancies. The case of screening for human immunodeficiency virus illustrates how discrepancies between guidelines may be related to different guideline development methods as well as the different perspectives of the guideline development groups.
在美国,人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题。美国预防服务工作组和疾病预防控制中心的突出指南在关于是否以及如何筛查未知处于高风险的成年人和青少年的建议上存在差异。这些差异导致了争议和辩论,以及临床医生的困惑。本文回顾了筛查原则,解释了与 HIV 筛查相关的具体问题,回顾了美国预防服务工作组和疾病预防控制中心指南之间的差异以及每个指南中使用的方法,并描述了差异的潜在原因。HIV 筛查的案例说明了指南之间的差异可能与不同的指南制定方法以及指南制定小组的不同观点有关。