Suppr超能文献

低聚合收缩型复合树脂与可压实型复合树脂的黏弹性比较。

Viscoelastic properties of low-shrinking composite resins compared to packable composite resins.

机构信息

Department of Biomaterials, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Dent Mater J. 2011;30(3):350-7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2010-181. Epub 2011 May 20.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of novel low-shrinking composites and compare them to those of packable composites. Six materials were tested: Clearfil Majesty Posterior (CM), ELS Extra Low Shrinkage (EL), Filtek P60 (FP), Filtek Silorane (FS), Prodigy (PR) and Surefil (SU). Static and dynamic testing was performed and materials were tested dry and wet at different temperatures (21°C to 50°C). Shear and flexural modulus, loss tangent, dynamic viscosity, Poisson's ratio and creep recovery were calculated among others. Significant differences were found both between the two groups and between materials belonging to the same group. CM presented the highest shear and flexural modulus and EL the lowest. All materials were softened by an increase of temperature, while FS was the least affected by water and PR showed to be the most susceptible. Different approaches used to overcome polymerization shrinkage lead to materials with different properties.

摘要

本研究旨在评估新型低收缩复合材料的粘弹性特性,并将其与可压实复合材料进行比较。共测试了 6 种材料:Clearfil Majesty Posterior(CM)、ELS Extra Low Shrinkage(EL)、Filtek P60(FP)、Filtek Silorane(FS)、Prodigy(PR)和 Surefil(SU)。进行了静态和动态测试,并在不同温度(21°C 至 50°C)下对干燥和湿润的材料进行了测试。计算了剪切和弯曲模量、损耗角正切、动态粘度、泊松比和蠕变恢复等参数。在两组之间以及同一组内的材料之间均发现了显著差异。CM 的剪切和弯曲模量最高,EL 则最低。所有材料的温度升高都会变软,而 FS 受水的影响最小,PR 则最容易受水的影响。为了克服聚合收缩,采用了不同的方法,导致材料具有不同的性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验