• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后长期临床结局的性别差异。

Sex difference in long-term clinical outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

作者信息

Trabattoni Daniela, Fabbiocchi Franco, Galli Stefano, Montorsi Piero, Lualdi Alessandro, Grancini Luca, Ravagnani Paolo, Bartorelli Antonio L

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, The Centro Cardiologico Fondazione 'Monzino' IRCCS, University of Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2011;22(6):442-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283475056.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283475056
PMID:21597366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary stenting in women has been associated with worse results in terms of morbidity, mortality, and restenosis rate in the bare-metal stent era, possibly due to higher risk profile and smaller coronary vessels. Although drug-eluting stents have equalized clinical results, no data are available on long-term outcomes between sexes.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of sex in acute, mid-term, and long-term clinical outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 1186 patients, 970 (81.8%) male and 216 (18.2%) female, treated with SES implantation between April 2002 and December 2005.

RESULTS

Women were older (P=0.049), more likely to have hypertension (43.5 vs. 33.7%, P=0.006), single-vessel disease (63.9 vs. 42.5%, P=0.03), and unstable angina (16.6% vs. 9.2%, P=0.001) and more frequently received small (≤ 2.75 mm) vessel stenting (39.3 vs. 28.2%, P=0.001). The two groups were similar for lesion and procedural characteristics. Overall, the stent thrombosis rate was 0.4% (0.5% in women vs. 0.3% in men, P=not significant). At 6-month follow-up, no significant difference in major adverse cardiac event was observed. Long-term follow-up (median time 33.2 months), available in 180 (83.3%) women and 720 (75%) men, showed higher angina recurrence rate (17.7 vs. 11%, P=0.013), percutaneous coronary re-intervention (16.1 vs. 8.7%, P=0.001) and target vessel revascularization (3.9 vs. 0.9%, P=0.001) in women compared with men. Late stent thrombosis, need for coronary artery bypass grafting, and mortality were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

No sex difference was observed in acute and 6-month outcome after SES implantation despite older age, more unstable clinical presentation, and more frequent small vessel stenting in women. However, long-term clinical follow-up (up to 5 years) in women showed higher symptom recurrence and target vessel revascularization rate but no difference in overall major adverse cardiac events.

摘要

背景

在裸金属支架时代,女性冠状动脉支架置入术在发病率、死亡率和再狭窄率方面的结果较差,这可能是由于女性具有更高的风险特征和更细小的冠状动脉血管。尽管药物洗脱支架使临床结果趋于均衡,但尚无关于两性长期预后的数据。

目的

评估性别在西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)植入术后急性、中期和长期临床结局中的作用。

方法

我们回顾性评估了2002年4月至2005年12月期间接受SES植入术的1186例患者,其中男性970例(81.8%),女性216例(18.2%)。

结果

女性年龄更大(P = 0.049),更易患高血压(43.5%对33.7%,P = 0.006)、单支血管病变(63.9%对42.5%,P = 0.03)和不稳定型心绞痛(16.6%对9.2%,P = 0.001),并且更频繁地接受小(≤2.75 mm)血管支架置入术(39.3%对28.2%,P = 0.001)。两组在病变和手术特征方面相似。总体而言,支架血栓形成率为0.4%(女性为0.5%,男性为0.3%,P无统计学意义)。在6个月随访时,未观察到主要不良心脏事件有显著差异。180例(83.3%)女性和720例(75%)男性有长期随访数据(中位时间33.2个月),结果显示女性心绞痛复发率(17.7%对11%,P = 0.013)、经皮冠状动脉再次干预率(16.1%对8.7%,P = 0.001)和靶血管血运重建率(3.9%对0.9%,P = 0.001)均高于男性。两组的晚期支架血栓形成、冠状动脉旁路移植术需求和死亡率相似。

结论

尽管女性年龄更大、临床表现更不稳定且更频繁地接受小血管支架置入术,但在SES植入术后的急性和6个月结局中未观察到性别差异。然而,女性的长期临床随访(长达5年)显示症状复发率和靶血管血运重建率更高,但总体主要不良心脏事件无差异。

相似文献

1
Sex difference in long-term clinical outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后长期临床结局的性别差异。
Coron Artery Dis. 2011;22(6):442-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283475056.
2
Late-term clinical outcomes with zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. 5-year follow-up of the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).晚期临床结果与佐他莫司和西罗莫司洗脱支架。ENDEAVOR III 试验(美敦力 Endeavor 药物 [ABT-578]洗脱冠状动脉支架系统与 Cypher 西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统在初发原生冠状动脉病变中的随机对照试验)的 5 年随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May;4(5):543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.014.
3
The unrestricted use of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents results in better clinical outcomes during 6-year follow-up than bare-metal stents: an analysis of the RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) registries.在 6 年随访期间,无限制使用西罗莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架的临床结果优于裸金属支架:对 RESEARCH(雷帕霉素洗脱支架在鹿特丹心脏病学医院评估)和 T-SEARCH(紫杉醇洗脱支架在鹿特丹心脏病学医院评估)注册研究的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1051-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.003.
4
Impact of sex on 3-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention using bare-metal and drug-eluting stents in previously untreated coronary artery disease: insights from the RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) Registries.性别对既往未经治疗的冠状动脉疾病患者使用裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后3年预后的影响:来自RESEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院雷帕霉素洗脱支架评估)和T-SEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院紫杉醇支架评估)注册研究的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul;2(7):603-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.016.
5
Impact of target lesion and nontarget lesion cardiac events on 5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting or bare-metal stenting.西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架置入术后靶病变和非靶病变心脏事件对5年临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(6):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.013.
6
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: RACES-MI trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:RACES-MI 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016.
7
Gender-based evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system: clinical and angiographic results from the SPIRIT III randomized trial.基于性别的 XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统评估:来自 SPIRIT III 随机试验的临床和血管造影结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):719-27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22067.
8
2-year clinical follow-up from the randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer and sirolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in routine clinical practice.常规临床实践中生物可降解聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与永久性聚合物涂层西罗莫司洗脱支架随机比较的 2 年临床随访。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):887-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.017.
9
Impact of intravascular ultrasound imaging on early and late clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.血管内超声成像对药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期和晚期临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Sep;4(9):974-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.005.
10
Comparison of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with de novo long coronary artery lesions: a randomized LONG-DES IV trial.比较新型的佐他莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架在治疗初发长段冠状动脉病变患者中的疗效:一项随机 LONG-DES IV 试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(5):633-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965673. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in the outcomes of stent implantation in mini-swine model.小型猪模型中支架植入结果的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):e0192004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192004. eCollection 2018.