• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善长期护理转诊流程:患者及护理人员的见解

Improving the long-term care referral process: insights from patients and caregivers.

作者信息

Guihan Marylou, Hedrick Susan, Miller Sara, Reder Sheri

机构信息

Center for Management of Complex Chronic Care (CMC3), Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois 60141-3030, USA.

出版信息

Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2011;32(2):135-51. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2011.572041.

DOI:10.1080/02701960.2011.572041
PMID:21598147
Abstract

Large increases in the need for long-term care (LTC) services are expected as baby boomers age. Little has been published about patient and caregiver preferences for information about LTC. However, our qualitative research findings suggest that potential consumers may find it difficult to obtain accurate and timely information about LTC programs and services. In-person, semistructured interviews were conducted with 47 subjects, including patients (n = 25) within 90 days of their referral to a LTC placement (including NH, assisted living, home care, and community) and their caregivers (n = 22). Interview questions addressed the events that seemed to trigger their need for a LTC referral, the resources they used to become more informed about LTC options and the issues they confronted with the LTC referral process. Qualitative analyses identified a number of patient and informal caregiver-reported barriers to making decisions about LTC services, including insufficient information about LTC programs and community resources, unclear funding requirements and inadequate funding, and difficulty knowing how to plan for LTC or make LTC decisions. A potential solution may be an online LTC Guide designed to provide accurate information about the range of LTC services, with an emphasis on home and community-based services. This Guide was developed to address the gap in comprehensive LTC information identified in the findings of this study.

摘要

随着婴儿潮一代步入老年,预计长期护理(LTC)服务的需求将大幅增加。关于患者和护理人员对长期护理信息的偏好,此前发表的内容较少。然而,我们的定性研究结果表明,潜在消费者可能会发现难以获得有关长期护理项目和服务的准确及时信息。我们对47名受试者进行了面对面的半结构化访谈,其中包括在被转介至长期护理机构(包括疗养院、辅助生活设施、家庭护理和社区服务)后90天内的患者(n = 25)及其护理人员(n = 22)。访谈问题涉及似乎引发他们对长期护理转介需求的事件、他们用来更深入了解长期护理选项的资源以及他们在长期护理转介过程中面临的问题。定性分析确定了一些患者和非正式护理人员报告的在做出长期护理服务决策时的障碍,包括关于长期护理项目和社区资源的信息不足、资金要求不明确和资金不足,以及难以知道如何规划长期护理或做出长期护理决策。一个潜在的解决方案可能是一个在线长期护理指南,旨在提供有关长期护理服务范围的准确信息,重点是基于家庭和社区的服务。本指南的制定是为了解决本研究结果中发现的全面长期护理信息方面的差距。

相似文献

1
Improving the long-term care referral process: insights from patients and caregivers.改善长期护理转诊流程:患者及护理人员的见解
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2011;32(2):135-51. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2011.572041.
2
Barriers to home and community-based service referrals: the physician's role.家庭和社区服务转诊的障碍:医生的作用。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2009;30(1):21-33. doi: 10.1080/02701960802690241.
3
Program and policy issues affecting home and community-based long-term care use: findings from a qualitative study.影响家庭和社区长期护理使用的计划与政策问题:一项定性研究的结果
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2006;25(3-4):107-27. doi: 10.1300/J027v25n03_07.
4
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
5
Service needs of residents in community-based long-term care facilities in northern Taiwan.台湾北部社区长期照护机构居民的服务需求
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(1):99-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01974.x.
6
The future of financing for long-term care: the Own Your Future campaign.长期护理融资的未来:“拥有你的未来”运动。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2010 Oct;22(4):379-93. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2010.507584.
7
Willingness to use formal long-term care services by Korean elders and their primary caregivers.韩国老年人及其主要照顾者使用正规长期护理服务的意愿。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2008;20(4):474-92. doi: 10.1080/08959420802160444.
8
Life after placement: experiences of older rural caregivers after placing a family member into residential care.安置后的生活:农村老年照料者在将家庭成员安置到机构照料后的经历
Rural Remote Health. 2008 Jul-Sep;8(3):1030. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
9
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
10
Bereaved hospice caregivers' views of the transition to hospice.临终关怀护理者对临终关怀过渡的看法。
Soc Work Health Care. 2010;49(5):387-400. doi: 10.1080/00981380903426822.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspective of Family Members of Transitions to Alternative Levels of Care in Anglo-Saxon Countries.盎格鲁-撒克逊国家中向其他护理级别过渡的家庭成员的观点
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2018 Feb 21;2018:4892438. doi: 10.1155/2018/4892438. eCollection 2018.
2
VA Staff Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Home-and Community-Based Placement Post-Hospital Discharge.退伍军人事务部工作人员对医院出院后家庭和社区安置的障碍和促进因素的看法。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2019 Jan-Feb;31(1):1-29. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1444889. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
Nursing Home Referral Within the Veterans Health Administration: Practice Variation by Payment Source and Facility Type.
退伍军人健康管理局内部的疗养院转诊:支付来源和机构类型导致的实践差异
Res Aging. 2018 Aug;40(7):687-711. doi: 10.1177/0164027517730383. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
4
Patients Are Not Given Quality-Of-Care Data About Skilled Nursing Facilities When Discharged From Hospitals.患者从医院出院时,并未获得有关熟练护理设施的护理质量数据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Aug 1;36(8):1385-1391. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0155.
5
Staff Perceptions of Key Factors Guiding Nursing Home Search and Selection Within the Veterans Health Administration.员工对退伍军人健康管理局内养老院搜索和选择的关键因素的看法。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jul 13;58(4):e226-e238. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx096.
6
VA staff perceptions of the role of the extended care referral process in home and community-based services versus nursing home use posthospital discharge.退伍军人事务部工作人员对出院后家庭和社区服务与疗养院使用中延伸护理转诊流程作用的看法。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2017 Apr-Jun;36(2):63-80. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2017.1336960. Epub 2017 Jun 12.