• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背板尺寸和方向对两种床垫类型心肺复苏模型中胸骨至脊柱压缩深度和压缩刚度的影响。

The impact of backboard size and orientation on sternum-to-spine compression depth and compression stiffness in a manikin study of CPR using two mattress types.

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering Research Group, Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2011 Aug;82(8):1064-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.003
PMID:21601344
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore how backboard orientation and size impact chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

METHODS

Experiments were conducted on a full-body CPR training manikin using a custom-built simulator. Two backboards of different sizes were tested in longitudinal (head to toe) and latitudinal (side to side) directions to assess the impact of size and orientation on chest compressions during CPR. The net sternum-to-spine displacement, combined mattress and sternal displacement as well as the axial reaction force were measured during each test.

RESULTS

The difference in net compression depth between the larger and smaller backboards ranged between 0.08±0.30 cm and 1.47±0.13 cm, while the difference in back support stiffness varied between 103.7±211 N/cm and 688.1±180.3 N/cm. The difference in net compression depth between the longitudinal and latitudinal backboard orientations ranged from 0.07±0.32 cm to 0.34±0.18 cm, while for the back support stiffness the difference was between 13.4±50.0 N/cm and 592.2±211.0 N/cm.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of backboard size on chest compression (CC) performance during CPR was found to be significant with the larger backboard producing deeper chest compressions and higher back support stiffness than the smaller backboard. The impact of backboard orientation was found to depend on the size of the backboard and type of mattress used. Clinicians should be aware that although a smaller backboard may be easier for rescuers to manipulate, it does not provide as effective back support or produce as deep chest compressions as a larger backboard.

摘要

目的

探讨背板的方向和大小对心肺复苏(CPR)期间胸部按压的影响。

方法

在使用定制模拟器的全身 CPR 训练人体模型上进行实验。测试了两种不同尺寸的背板,分别在纵(从头到脚)和横(从一侧到另一侧)方向上,以评估尺寸和方向对 CPR 期间胸部按压的影响。在每次测试中测量胸骨-脊柱净位移、组合床垫和胸骨位移以及轴向反作用力。

结果

较大背板和较小背板之间的净压缩深度差异在 0.08±0.30 cm 至 1.47±0.13 cm 之间,而背板支撑刚度的差异在 103.7±211 N/cm 至 688.1±180.3 N/cm 之间。纵向和横向背板方向之间的净压缩深度差异范围为 0.07±0.32 cm 至 0.34±0.18 cm,而背板支撑刚度的差异范围为 13.4±50.0 N/cm 至 592.2±211.0 N/cm。

结论

背板尺寸对 CPR 期间胸部按压(CC)性能的影响被发现是显著的,较大的背板产生的胸部按压更深,背板支撑刚度也更高。背板方向的影响取决于背板的尺寸和使用的床垫类型。临床医生应该意识到,虽然较小的背板可能更容易救援人员操作,但它不能提供有效的背部支撑或产生与较大背板一样深的胸部按压。

相似文献

1
The impact of backboard size and orientation on sternum-to-spine compression depth and compression stiffness in a manikin study of CPR using two mattress types.背板尺寸和方向对两种床垫类型心肺复苏模型中胸骨至脊柱压缩深度和压缩刚度的影响。
Resuscitation. 2011 Aug;82(8):1064-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
2
Comparison of experimental chest compression data to a theoretical model for the mechanics of constant peak displacement cardiopulmonary resuscitation.比较实验性胸部按压数据与恒定峰值位移心肺复苏力学理论模型。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1167-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01213.x.
3
The impact of compliant surfaces on in-hospital chest compressions: effects of common mattresses and a backboard.顺应性表面对院内胸外按压的影响:普通床垫和背板的作用
Resuscitation. 2009 May;80(5):546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.03.023.
4
Effect of mattress deflection on CPR quality assessment for older children and adolescents.床垫挠度对大龄儿童和青少年心肺复苏质量评估的影响。
Resuscitation. 2009 May;80(5):540-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
5
Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.在有无背板的不同柔软度表面上进行人工胸外按压与机械胸外按压的比较:一项随机交叉人体模型研究。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):594-600.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
6
Forensic analysis of crib mattress properties on pediatric CPR quality--can we balance pressure reduction with CPR effectiveness?小儿心肺复苏质量中婴儿床床垫特性的法医分析——我们能否在降低压力与 CPR 效果之间取得平衡?
Resuscitation. 2013 Aug;84(8):1131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.033. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
7
Increasing compression depth during manikin CPR using a simple backboard.使用简易背板在模拟人心肺复苏期间增加按压深度。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Jul;51(6):747-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01304.x. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
8
Compression feedback devices over estimate chest compression depth when performed on a bed.在病床上使用时,按压反馈设备会高估胸部按压深度。
Resuscitation. 2009 Jan;80(1):79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.08.011. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
9
The impact of various backboard configurations on compression stiffness in a manikin study of CPR.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:2484-7. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090689.
10
The use of dual accelerometers improves measurement of chest compression depth.使用双加速度计可提高胸外按压深度的测量精度。
Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite Element Analysis of a Rib Cage Model: Influence of Four Variables on Fatigue Life during Simulated Manual CPR.胸廓模型的有限元分析:模拟徒手心肺复苏过程中四个变量对疲劳寿命的影响
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 15;11(5):491. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11050491.
2
Adult Basic Life Support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.成人基础生命支持:心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理科学的国际共识,附有治疗推荐。
Resuscitation. 2020 Nov;156:A35-A79. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
[Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation.].
[成人基础生命支持和自动体外除颤。]
Notf Rett Med. 2017;20(Suppl 1):3-24. doi: 10.1007/s10049-017-0328-0. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
4
[Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation.].[成人基础生命支持和自动体外除颤。]
Notf Rett Med. 2015;18(8):748-769. doi: 10.1007/s10049-015-0081-1. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Reducing the impact of intensive care unit mattress compressibility during CPR: a simulation-based study.在心肺复苏期间降低重症监护病房床垫可压缩性的影响:一项基于模拟的研究。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Nov 16;2:22. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0057-y. eCollection 2017.
6
50% duty cycle may be inappropriate to achieve a sufficient chest compression depth when cardiopulmonary resuscitation is performed by female or light rescuers.当由女性或身材较轻的救援者进行心肺复苏时,50%的按压比例可能不适用于实现足够的胸部按压深度。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015 Mar 31;2(1):9-15. doi: 10.15441/ceem.14.046. eCollection 2015 Mar.
7
[Current recommendations for basic/advanced life support : Addressing unanswered questions and future prospects].[基础/高级生命支持的当前建议:解决未解答的问题及未来前景]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016 Nov;111(8):670-681. doi: 10.1007/s00063-016-0216-2. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
Performance of different support surfaces during experimental resuscitation (CPR).不同支撑面在实验性复苏(CPR)期间的表现。
Heliyon. 2016 Feb 19;2(2):e00074. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00074. eCollection 2016 Feb.
9
Training a Chest Compression of 6-7 cm Depth for High Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Hospital Setting: A Randomised Controlled Trial.在医院环境中进行高质量心肺复苏的6-7厘米深度胸外按压训练:一项随机对照试验
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Mar;57(2):505-11. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.505.
10
Optimal chest compression in cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon thoracic and back support stiffness.心肺复苏术的最佳胸部按压取决于胸部和背部支撑的硬度。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Dec;50(12):1269-78. doi: 10.1007/s11517-012-0963-z. Epub 2012 Oct 9.