Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Oct;26(7):1117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 23.
This study compared the clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach with a muscle-sparing technique (modified Watson-Jones approach) and the modified mini-incision direct lateral approach. We randomly assigned 102 patients to the muscle-sparing group (n = 52) or the mini-incision direct lateral group (n = 50). Muscle strength recovery of hip abduction at 6 weeks after surgery was better, and creatine kinase level at 1 day after surgery was lower in the muscle-sparing group than in the mini-incision direct lateral group (P < .01). However, there was no difference in the Harris hip score, pain visual analog scale, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 score between the 2 groups throughout the 1-year study period.
这项研究比较了使用微创前外侧入路(改良 Watson-Jones 入路)和改良小切口直接外侧入路进行全髋关节置换术的临床效果。我们将 102 名患者随机分为肌保留组(n = 52)或小切口直接外侧组(n = 50)。术后 6 周时,髋关节外展肌力恢复较好,且肌保留组术后 1 天的肌酸激酶水平低于小切口直接外侧组(P <.01)。然而,在整个 1 年的研究期间,两组的 Harris 髋关节评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数以及医疗结果研究 36 简表评分均无差异。