• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于前侧的肌肉保留入路髋关节:髋关节的“另一种”前侧入路。

The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach to the hip: the "other" anterior approach to the hip.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Clinic, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, C.T.O. Largo Palagi 1, 50139, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2019 Jan;43(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4190-6. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-018-4190-6
PMID:30284607
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety, efficacy, and learning curves of anterior-based muscle-sparing total hip arthroplasty (ABMS-THA) in the supine position. Furthermore, early functional outcome was evaluated and compared to direct anterior approach (DAA) by measuring surface electromyography (sEMG).

METHODS

We present a prospective cohort study of 343 hips. The safety and learning curve were assessed by recording operative time and peri-operative adverse events. For assessment of efficacy, functional and radiological outcomes were evaluated. A selected group of 32 patients have been studied by sEMG and compared to a matched group of 32 patients who received a THA using DAA approach.

RESULTS

There was one dislocation (0.3%); two (0.6%) patients had an intra-operative fractures of the greater trochanter; two patients (0.6%) experienced a self-limited femoral nerve palsy. Physical therapy milestones for hospital discharge were reached on an average of 1.7 days. sEMG showed that ABMS and DAA have a similar muscle recruitment pattern and functional recovery after THA. One patient was revised for infection, 16 were lost, and 326 hips were available with a median follow-up of 42 months (range 24-60). The mean Harris Hip Score (HSS) increased from 44.3 to 91.9. Ninety-six percent of the hips had a leg length discrepancy (LLD) < 5 mm. There were no radiological signs of mechanical loosening or osteolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABMS approach in the supine position is clinically effective and safe; special advantages include a very low dislocation rate and a great control of LLD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估仰卧位基于前侧肌肉保留的全髋关节置换术(ABMS-THA)的安全性、疗效和学习曲线。此外,通过测量表面肌电图(sEMG)来评估早期功能结果,并与直接前入路(DAA)进行比较。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,共纳入 343 髋。通过记录手术时间和围手术期不良事件来评估安全性和学习曲线。为了评估疗效,评估了功能和影像学结果。选择了 32 例患者进行 sEMG 研究,并与接受 DAA 治疗的 32 例患者进行匹配比较。

结果

发生 1 例脱位(0.3%);2 例(0.6%)患者大转子术中骨折;2 例(0.6%)患者出现短暂性股神经麻痹。平均住院 1.7 天达到物理治疗出院标准。sEMG 显示 ABMS 和 DAA 在 THR 后具有相似的肌肉募集模式和功能恢复。1 例患者因感染翻修,16 例失访,326 髋获得中位随访 42 个月(范围 24-60)。Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)从 44.3 增加到 91.9。96%的髋有<5mm 的下肢长度差异(LLD)。无影像学机械松动或骨溶解迹象。

结论

仰卧位基于前侧肌肉保留的全髋关节置换术具有临床有效性和安全性;特别的优势包括非常低的脱位率和很好的控制下肢长度差异。

相似文献

1
The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach to the hip: the "other" anterior approach to the hip.基于前侧的肌肉保留入路髋关节:髋关节的“另一种”前侧入路。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jan;43(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4190-6. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
2
Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA?初次全髋关节置换术后手术入路会影响患者报告的功能吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):971-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4639-5. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
John Charnley Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior and Miniposterior Approach THA: Which Provides Better Functional Recovery?约翰·查恩利奖:直接前路与微创后路全髋关节置换术的随机临床试验:哪种方法能带来更好的功能恢复?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):216-229. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000112.
4
Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Is it a true muscle sparing approach when performed by a low volume hip replacement surgeon?全髋关节置换术中向直接前路入路的转变。对于低手术量的髋关节置换外科医生来说,这真的是一种保留肌肉的入路吗?
Int Orthop. 2017 Nov;41(11):2245-2252. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3480-8. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
5
[Mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to hip sepsis].[髋关节脓毒症继发骨关节炎的全髋关节置换术中期结果]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;28(2):218-22.
6
Safety in early experience with a direct anterior approach using fluoroscopic guidance with manual leg control for primary total hip arthroplasty: a consecutive one hundred and twenty case series.采用透视引导下手动控制腿部的直接前路入路进行初次全髋关节置换术早期经验的安全性:连续120例病例系列。
Int Orthop. 2016 Dec;40(12):2487-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3159-6. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
7
Anterolateral muscle sparing approach total hip arthroplasty: an anatomic and clinical study.前外侧肌肉保留入路全髋关节置换术:一项解剖学与临床研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Aug 5;121(15):1358-63.
8
Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: Can leg length be satisfactorily controlled via anterior approach without a traction table? Evaluation in 56 patients with EOS 3D.全髋关节置换术后下肢长度差异:通过前方入路不使用牵引床是否可以满意地控制下肢长度?EOS 3D 评估 56 例患者。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1143-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
[Comparison of the effects of total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach and posterolateral piriformis-sparing approach].[直接前方入路与保留梨状肌的后外侧入路全髋关节置换术效果比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Apr 18;49(2):214-220.
10
[Comparison of the effect of total hip arthroplasty through mini invasive direct anterior approach during learning curve period and posterolateral approach for the treatment of femoral head necrosis].[学习曲线期微创直接前路与后外侧入路全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Aug 25;29(8):702-707. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.08.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of outcomes and cost-effectiveness of simultaneous and staged total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral-supine approach.采用仰卧位前外侧入路的同期与分期全髋关节置换术的疗效及成本效益比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 29;20(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05840-x.
2
Surgical Tips and Tricks for the Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach During Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中基于前方保留肌肉入路的手术技巧与窍门
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 10;30:101514. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101514. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Preserving medial iliofemoral ligament avoids excessive leg lengthening in total hip arthroplasty using anterolateral-supine approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient's perspective on direct anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty.患者对直接前入路与后入路全髋关节置换术的看法。
Int Orthop. 2018 Dec;42(12):2771-2775. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4002-z. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
2
The minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the traditional anterolateral approach (Watson-Jones) for hip hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical outcomes.股骨颈骨折后髋关节半关节置换术的微创前外侧入路与传统前外侧入路(沃森-琼斯入路):临床结果分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1943-1948. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3756-z. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
3
The Röttinger approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, comparison to the direct lateral approach and review of literature.
在采用仰卧位前外侧入路的全髋关节置换术中,保留髂股内侧韧带可避免腿部过度延长。
J Orthop. 2024 Sep 6;60:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.004. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Hardware Removal and Conversion Hip Arthroplasty via a Single Interval Anterior Approach: Surgical Technique.经单一间隙前入路取出硬件并转换髋关节置换术:手术技术
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Apr 17;27:101369. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101369. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Minimal Influence on Muscle Strength and Patient Reported Outcome Measures by Conjoined Tendon Detachment in Anterolateral Muscle-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty.在前外侧保留肌肉的全髋关节置换术中,联合肌腱松解对肌肉力量和患者报告的结局指标影响极小。
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Jan 5;58(2):127-134. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01080-5. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Does robot-assisted surgery reduce leg length discrepancy in total hip replacement? Robot-assisted posterior approach versus direct anterior approach and manual posterior approach: a propensity score-matching study.机器人辅助手术是否能减少全髋关节置换术后的下肢长度差异?机器人辅助后入路与直接前入路和手动后入路的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 22;18(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03864-9.
7
Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing (ABMS) Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术的基于前方的肌肉保留(ABMS)入路
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022 Sep 12;12(3):e21.00061. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00061. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
8
The ABLE Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach: A Safe and Effective Option for Total Hip Arthroplasty.ABLE基于前方的肌肉保留入路:全髋关节置换术的一种安全有效的选择。
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Jul 19;16:264-269.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.007. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Association between Hip Center Position and Isokinetic Hip Muscle Performance after Anterolateral Muscle-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节中心位置与前外侧肌保留型全髋关节置换术后等速髋关节肌肉性能的关系。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 13;58(4):538. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040538.
10
Outcomes of the Supine Anterior-based Muscle-sparing Approach for Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty.仰卧前路肌保留入路在初次和翻修髋关节置换术中的应用效果。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Feb 2;6(2):e21.00050. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00050.
罗廷格全髋关节置换术方法:技术、与直接外侧入路的比较及文献综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 3):S31. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.21.
4
Total hip arthroplasty performed with a tissue-preserving technique using superior capsulotomy.采用保留组织技术并通过上方关节囊切开术进行全髋关节置换术。
Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):281-287. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3722-9. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Function and activity after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to a healthy population.与健康人群相比,微创全髋关节置换术后的功能与活动情况。
Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3541-z. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position.手术入路是否会影响全髋关节置换术中的植入物对线?仰卧位下直接前路与前外侧入路的比较研究。
Int Orthop. 2017 Dec;41(12):2487-2493. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3521-3. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Is it a true muscle sparing approach when performed by a low volume hip replacement surgeon?全髋关节置换术中向直接前路入路的转变。对于低手术量的髋关节置换外科医生来说,这真的是一种保留肌肉的入路吗?
Int Orthop. 2017 Nov;41(11):2245-2252. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3480-8. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
Bikini versus traditional incision direct anterior approach: is there any difference in soft tissue damage?比基尼切口与传统切口直接前路入路:软组织损伤有差异吗?
Hip Int. 2017 Jul 25;27(4):397-400. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000478. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
9
Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.意大利的全髋关节置换术不稳定性
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3345-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation.采用直接前路入路和双动髋臼杯的全髋关节置换术:预防术后脱位的安全有效策略。
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3333-x. Epub 2016 Nov 16.