• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于解决决策模型中结构不确定性的框架。

A framework for addressing structural uncertainty in decision models.

机构信息

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK (CHJ, SGT, LDS)

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK (LB, KC)

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):662-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11406986. Epub 2011 May 20.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X11406986
PMID:21602487
Abstract

Decision analytic models used for health technology assessment are subject to uncertainties. These uncertainties can be quantified probabilistically, by placing distributions on model parameters and simulating from these to generate estimates of cost-effectiveness. However, many uncertain model choices, often termed structural assumptions, are usually only explored informally by presenting estimates of cost-effectiveness under alternative scenarios. The authors show how 2 recent research proposals represent parts of a framework to formally account for all common structural uncertainties. First, the model is expanded to include parameters that encompass all possible structural choices. Uncertainty can then arise because these parameters are estimated imprecisely from data, for example, a treatment effect of doubtful significance. Uncertainty can also arise if there are no relevant data. If there are relevant data, uncertainty can be addressed by averaging expected costs and effects generated from probabilistic analysis of the models with and without the parameter. The weights used for averaging are related to the predictive ability of each model, assessed against the data. If there are no data, additional parameters can often be informed by eliciting expert beliefs as probability distributions. These ideas are illustrated in decision models for antiplatelet therapies for vascular disease and new biologic drugs for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis.

摘要

用于健康技术评估的决策分析模型会存在不确定性。这些不确定性可以通过对模型参数进行概率分布,并从这些分布中进行模拟,从而生成成本效益估计值来进行量化。然而,许多不确定的模型选择,通常被称为结构假设,通常只是通过呈现替代方案下的成本效益估计值来进行非正式的探讨。作者展示了最近的两项研究提案如何代表了一个正式考虑所有常见结构不确定性的框架的一部分。首先,模型被扩展到包括涵盖所有可能结构选择的参数。不确定性可能会因为这些参数是从数据中不准确地估计出来的,例如,治疗效果存在疑问。如果没有相关数据,也会产生不确定性。如果有相关数据,则可以通过对有和没有该参数的模型进行概率分析来生成成本和效果的预期平均值来解决不确定性。用于平均值的权重与针对数据评估的每个模型的预测能力有关。如果没有数据,则可以通过启发式地将专家的信念作为概率分布来为其他参数提供信息。这些想法在血管疾病的抗血小板治疗和治疗活动性银屑病关节炎的新型生物药物的决策模型中得到了说明。

相似文献

1
A framework for addressing structural uncertainty in decision models.用于解决决策模型中结构不确定性的框架。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):662-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11406986. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Eliciting distributions to populate decision analytic models.启发式分布以填充决策分析模型。
Value Health. 2010 Aug;13(5):557-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00709.x. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
3
A preliminary model-based assessment of the cost-utility of a screening programme for early age-related macular degeneration.基于模型的早期年龄相关性黄斑变性筛查项目成本效益的初步评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(27):iii-iv, ix-124. doi: 10.3310/hta12270.
4
Characterizing structural uncertainty in decision analytic models: a review and application of methods.刻画决策分析模型中的结构不确定性:方法回顾与应用。
Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):739-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00502.x.
5
Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: a mixed-methods study.制定医疗保健决策中结构化专家 elicitation 的参考协议:混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jun;25(37):1-124. doi: 10.3310/hta25370.
6
Ceftazidime with avibactam for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗严重需氧革兰氏阴性细菌感染:技术评估以支持新型订阅式支付模式。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(73):1-230. doi: 10.3310/YAPL9347.
7
Cefiderocol for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model.头孢地尔罗治疗严重需氧革兰氏阴性细菌感染:技术评估以提供一种新的订阅式支付模式。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(28):1-238. doi: 10.3310/YGWR4511.
8
Net Monetary Benefit Lines Augmented with Value-of-Information Measures to Present the Results of Economic Evaluations under Uncertainty.加入信息价值衡量指标的净货币效益线以呈现不确定性下经济评估的结果。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Oct;44(7):770-786. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241262343. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
9
Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies.医疗保健经济评估研究中的可推广性:综述与案例研究
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(49):iii-iv, 1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta8490.
10
Structural and parameter uncertainty in Bayesian cost-effectiveness models.贝叶斯成本效益模型中的结构和参数不确定性。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2010 Mar;59(2):233-253. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00684.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Role and Policy Implications of Using External Evidence in Survival Extrapolations: A Case Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Therapy for Second-Line DLBCL.评估外部证据在生存外推中的作用及政策影响:以阿基仑赛治疗二线弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤为例
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01529-5.
2
Defining Biological and Clinical Plausibility: The DICSA Framework for Protocolized Assessment in Survival Extrapolations Across Therapeutic Areas.定义生物学和临床合理性:跨治疗领域生存外推中方案化评估的DICSA框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Mar 29. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01485-0.
3
Unravelling the Association Between Uncertainties in Model-based Economic Analysis and Funding Recommendations of Medicines in Australia.
解析基于模型的经济分析中的不确定性与澳大利亚药品资助建议之间的关联。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Mar;43(3):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01446-z. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
4
Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Pharmacometric-Based Pharmacoeconomic Modeling in the Cost-Utility Evaluation of Sunitinib Therapy.舒尼替尼治疗成本-效用评估中传统与基于药动学的药物经济学建模的比较分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jan;43(1):31-43. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01438-z. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
5
Calculating the Expected Net Benefit of Sampling for Survival Data: A Tutorial and Case Study.计算生存数据抽样的预期净收益:教程与案例研究。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Oct;44(7):719-741. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241279459. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Analyzing quality of life among people with opioid use disorder from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Data Share initiative: implications for decision making.分析来自国家药物滥用研究所数据共享计划的阿片类药物使用障碍患者的生活质量:对决策的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2783-2796. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03729-6. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
7
A Guide to an Iterative Approach to Model-Based Decision Making in Health and Medicine: An Iterative Decision-Making Framework.健康与医学中基于模型的决策的迭代方法指南:迭代决策框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Apr;42(4):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01341-z. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
8
Response to "UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT IN REGULATORY AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT DECISION-MAKING ON DRUGS: GUIDANCE OF THE HTAi-DIA WORKING GROUP".对《药品监管与卫生技术评估决策中的不确定性管理:HTAi-DIA 工作组指南》的回应
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Oct 12;39(1):e70. doi: 10.1017/S026646232300260X.
9
INES: Interactive tool for construction and extrapolation of partitioned survival models.INES:用于构建和外推分区生存模型的交互式工具。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jul 31;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00456-6.
10
How Sensitive is Sensitivity Analysis?: Evaluation of Pharmacoeconomic Submissions in Korea.敏感性分析的敏感度如何?:韩国药物经济学申报文件评估
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 16;13:884769. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.884769. eCollection 2022.