Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Block AS4, Level 2, 9 Arts Link, Singapore 11750.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Sep;25(3):511-20. doi: 10.1037/a0024013.
This study aimed to delineate various pathways whereby cognitive and emotional vulnerabilities triggered by stress would lead to disruptive gambling. A multiple mediation framework was proposed to specify that gambling cognition and subjective well-being would mediate the influence of perceived stress on problem gambling. The cross-cultural validity of the proposed framework was examined with 132 White gamblers in Australia and 154 Chinese gamblers in China. They completed psychological scales on perceived stress, gambling expectancy bias, gambling refusal efficacy, negative affect, life satisfaction, and problem gambling. Compared to Chinese gamblers, White gamblers reported higher levels of perceived stress, gambling expectancy bias, and problem gambling as well as more pervasive negative affect and lower levels of life satisfaction. Results showed that the proposed multiple mediation framework fit the data better than two alternative plausible models. Life satisfaction and gambling refusal efficacy were two consistent mediators across White and Chinese gamblers.
本研究旨在描绘各种途径,通过这些途径,压力引发的认知和情绪脆弱性会导致赌博障碍。提出了一个多重中介框架,以明确感知压力对赌博问题的影响是通过赌博认知和主观幸福感来中介的。该框架的跨文化有效性通过对澳大利亚的 132 名白人赌徒和中国的 154 名中国赌徒进行检验。他们完成了关于感知压力、赌博期望偏差、赌博拒绝效能、负性情绪、生活满意度和赌博问题的心理量表。与中国赌徒相比,白人赌徒报告的感知压力、赌博期望偏差和赌博问题更多,负性情绪更普遍,生活满意度更低。结果表明,与两个替代的合理模型相比,所提出的多重中介框架更符合数据。生活满意度和赌博拒绝效能是白人赌徒和中国赌徒中两个一致的中介变量。