Microcoil embolization during abdominal vascular interventions through microcatheters with a tip of 2 French or less.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical aspects of embolization using microcoils through a microcatheter with a tip of 2F or smaller during abdominal vascular interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Coil embolization through a microcatheter with a tip of 2F or smaller was attempted in 73 procedures. Two types of microcoil-Liquid Coil (Boston Scientific, Watertown, MA, USA) and Tornado Coil (Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA)-were deployed through four types of thinner microcatheter [2F tip (n = 49) and 1.8F tip (n = 24)]. Coil jams in the microcatheter and coil migration were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 286 microcoils were placed (mean ± SD, 3.9 ± 4.3 coils per procedure, range 1-32 coils). In 19 procedures (26.9%), Liquid Coils were used alone. In 44 (60.3%), Tornado Coils were used alone. In 10 (13.7%), Liquid Coils and Tornado Coils were combined. There were no coil jams in the microcatheter in this series. One Tornado Coil (0.3%) delivered into the gastroduodenal artery migrated to the right hepatic artery.

CONCLUSION

Liquid Coils and Tornado Coils can be placed through a thinner microcatheter without difficulty. However, there is a risk of coil migration in large vessels or at the proximal site because the catheter tip is not stabilized.