• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜辅助与开放根治性胃切除术对胃癌患者淋巴结清扫的影响]

[Effect of laparoscopy assisted vs. open radical gastrectomy on lymph node dissection in patients with gastric cancer].

作者信息

Huang Chang-ming, Lin Jian-xian, Zheng Chao-hui, Li Ping, Xie Jian-wei, Wang Jia-bin

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Mar 1;49(3):200-3.

PMID:21609560
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopy assisted radical gastrectomy on lymph node (LN) dissection for gastric cancer and to compare it with open gastrectomy.

METHODS

The clinical data of 934 patients with gastric cancer underwent radical resection from January 2007 to May 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Among the patients, 506 cases received laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy (LAG group) and 428 cases received open gastrectomy (OG group). The number of retrieved LNs and the survival curve between the two groups was compared. Then, the relations between the number of dissected LNs and postoperative morbidity were analyzed.

RESULTS

For all patients, the mean number of dissected LNs was 29 ± 10, there was no significantly differences between LAG group and OG group (P < 0.05). While the number of the retrieved No.7, 8 LNs in LAG group were significantly more than those in OG group. No significant differences was found in the number of dissected LNs for the pT1-2 stages tumors between the two groups, but significantly greater number of LNs was harvested by LAG group in pT3 stage (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the number of dissected LNs in different gastrectomy types or extents of LN dissection between the two groups. In the first 50 cases, there were less dissected LNs in LAG group than that in OG group, while 51 cases later, there was no significantly differences in number of dissected LNS between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative morbidity of LAG group and OG group was 11.1% and 20.1%, respectively (P < 0.05), but there was no significant correlations between the number of dissected LNs and postoperative morbidity in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With the improvement in surgical skills, laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is a safe and feasible procedure, and it is oncologically compatible with open gastrectomy. Suitable increment of dissected LN count would not increase the postoperative complication rate.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜辅助根治性胃癌切除术在淋巴结清扫方面的可行性和疗效,并与开腹胃癌切除术进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析2007年1月至2010年5月期间接受根治性切除的934例胃癌患者的临床资料。其中,506例接受腹腔镜辅助胃癌切除术(LAG组),428例接受开腹胃癌切除术(OG组)。比较两组的淋巴结清扫数量及生存曲线。然后,分析淋巴结清扫数量与术后并发症之间的关系。

结果

所有患者的平均淋巴结清扫数量为29±10,LAG组和OG组之间无显著差异(P<0.05)。然而,LAG组第7、8组淋巴结清扫数量显著多于OG组。两组pT1-2期肿瘤的淋巴结清扫数量无显著差异,但LAG组在pT3期清扫的淋巴结数量显著更多(P<0.05)。两组在不同胃癌切除类型或淋巴结清扫范围内的淋巴结清扫数量无显著差异。在前50例中,LAG组的淋巴结清扫数量少于OG组,而在随后的51例中,两组的淋巴结清扫数量无显著差异(P>0.05)。LAG组和OG组的术后并发症发生率分别为11.1%和20.1%(P<0.05),但两组中淋巴结清扫数量与术后并发症之间均无显著相关性。

结论

随着手术技巧的提高,腹腔镜辅助根治性胃癌切除术加淋巴结清扫是一种安全可行的手术,在肿瘤学上与开腹手术相当。适当增加淋巴结清扫数量不会增加术后并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
[Effect of laparoscopy assisted vs. open radical gastrectomy on lymph node dissection in patients with gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助与开放根治性胃切除术对胃癌患者淋巴结清扫的影响]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Mar 1;49(3):200-3.
2
A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.一项比较进展期胃癌行开腹与腹腔镜辅助 D2 根治术的前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):331-7. doi: 10.1159/000330782. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
3
Assessment of open versus laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in lymph node-positive early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.淋巴结阳性早期胃癌行开腹与腹腔镜辅助胃切除术的评估:回顾性队列分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;102(1):77-81. doi: 10.1002/jso.21554.
4
[Laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer in the elderly].[腹腔镜辅助下D2淋巴结清扫根治性胃癌切除术治疗老年胃癌]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;15(2):152-6.
5
Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜辅助下与传统开放远端胃切除术及胃周外淋巴结清扫术的比较
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;91(1):90-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.20271.
6
Open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced upper gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.进展期上部胃癌的开放手术与腹腔镜辅助D2根治性胃切除术:一项回顾性队列研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Oct;60(127):1805-8.
7
[Short-term efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection in distal gastric cancer].腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术联合淋巴结清扫术治疗远端胃癌的短期疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;12(6):584-7.
8
Comparative analysis of five-year survival results of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a case-control study using a propensity score method.采用倾向评分匹配法的腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌五年生存结果的对比分析:一项病例对照研究。
Dig Surg. 2012;29(2):165-71. doi: 10.1159/000338088. Epub 2012 May 21.
9
[Advantage of perisplenic hilar lymph node dissection by laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (D2) over conventional open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术(D2)行脾门周围淋巴结清扫术相较于传统开放性全胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的优势]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;33(11):864-7.
10
[A comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助与开放远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的对比研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May 1;51(5):396-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Technical pro & cons of the laparoscopic lymphadenectomy.腹腔镜淋巴结清扫术的技术优缺点。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec 27;1:93. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2016.12.04. eCollection 2016.