Division of Pharmacology, LACDR, Leiden University, PO Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):928-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 May 14.
The binding of PET radiotracer [(11)C]flumazenil to the GABA(A) receptors is described by the receptor density (B(max)) and binding affinity (K(D)). The estimation of B(max) and K(D) is usually based on Scatchard analysis including at least two PET scans at steady state of various specific activities. Recently, a novel full saturation method to estimate both B(max) and K(D) was proposed, in which a saturating dose of flumazenil is given to cover a wide range of different receptor occupancies within a single scan. The aim of the present study was a direct comparison of steady state and full saturation methods for determining B(max) and K(D) of [(11)C]flumazenil in the same group of male Sprague-Dawley rats. Fourteen rats underwent 3 consecutive [(11)C]flumazenil scans of 30 min duration each. A tracer dose was injected at the start of the first scan. Prior to the second scan the tracer was mixed with 5, 20, 100 or 500 μg unlabelled (cold) flumazenil to cover a wide range of receptor occupancies during the scan. The third scan was performed during a constant intravenous infusion of unlabelled flumazenil, resulting in ~50% GABA(A) receptor occupancy. The first and third scans were part of the steady state method, whilst the second scan was performed according to the full saturation method. For both methods, B(max) and K(D) were then derived by compartmental modelling. Both methods yielded similar B(max) and K(D) estimates. The full saturation method yielded B(max) values of 37 ± 5.8 ng · mL(-1) and K(D) values of 7.6 ± 2.0 ng · mL(-1), whilst the steady state method yielded B(max) values of 33 ± 5.4 ng · mL(-1) and K(D) values of 7.1 ± 0.8 ng · mL(-1). The main advantage of the full saturation method is that B(max) and K(D) can be obtained from a single PET scan.
正电子发射断层扫描(PET)示踪剂[¹¹C]氟马西尼与 GABA(A)受体的结合由受体密度(B(max))和结合亲和力(K(D))来描述。B(max)和 K(D)的估计通常基于 Scatchard 分析,包括至少两个在不同放射性示踪剂活度下处于稳定状态的 PET 扫描。最近,提出了一种新的全饱和方法来估计 B(max)和 K(D),其中在单个扫描中给予饱和剂量的氟马西尼,以覆盖受体占有率的广泛范围。本研究的目的是直接比较稳态和全饱和方法在同一组雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠中确定[¹¹C]氟马西尼的 B(max)和 K(D)。14 只大鼠进行了 3 次连续的[¹¹C]氟马西尼扫描,每次持续 30 分钟。在第一次扫描开始时注射示踪剂剂量。在第二次扫描之前,将示踪剂与 5、20、100 或 500μg 未标记(冷)氟马西尼混合,以在扫描期间覆盖广泛的受体占有率。第三次扫描是在未标记氟马西尼的恒速静脉输注期间进行的,导致约 50%的 GABA(A)受体占有率。第一次和第三次扫描是稳态方法的一部分,而第二次扫描是根据全饱和方法进行的。对于两种方法,B(max)和 K(D)都是通过室模型推导出来的。两种方法都得出了相似的 B(max)和 K(D)估计值。全饱和方法得出的 B(max)值为 37±5.8ng·mL⁻¹,K(D)值为 7.6±2.0ng·mL⁻¹,而稳态方法得出的 B(max)值为 33±5.4ng·mL⁻¹,K(D)值为 7.1±0.8ng·mL⁻¹。全饱和方法的主要优点是可以从单个 PET 扫描中获得 B(max)和 K(D)。