Suppr超能文献

创伤安全网医院是否提供真正安全的创伤护理?对国家创伤数据库的多层次分析。

Do trauma safety-net hospitals deliver truly safe trauma care? A multilevel analysis of the national trauma data bank.

作者信息

Vettukattil Anit S, Haider Adil H, Haut Elliott R, Chang David C, Oyetunji Tolulope, Cornwell Edward E, Stevens Kent A, Efron David T

机构信息

Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Apr;70(4):978-84. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820b5d0c.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients treated at "safety-net hospitals," facilities that care for a high percentage of uninsured patients, are known to have worse outcomes. This study seeks to analyze whether care at "trauma safety-net hospitals" (TSNH) accounts for the known mortality disparity between uninsured and insured trauma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of trauma patients (age, 18-64 years) in the National Trauma Data Bank (6.2; 2001-2005) with moderate to severe injury (Injury Severity Score ≥9) was performed. TSNH were defined as facilities treating ≥47% uninsured trauma patients. The main outcome measure was adjusted mortality of patients treated at TSNH versus non-TSNH. A multilevel analysis using multiple logistic regression and generalized estimating equations was performed to control for both hospital and patient-level characteristics (age, gender, insurance, injury severity, shock, and type and mechanism of injury). Subset analyses by hospital trauma level designation and patient injury severity and type were also performed.

RESULTS

Collectively 343,053 trauma patients were treated at 46 TSNH and 413 non-TSNH. TSNH patients (n = 36,774) were more likely to be minorities (55% vs. 27%; p < 0.05) compared with non-TSNH patients (n = 306,279). Unadjusted mortality was greater in TSNH versus non-TSNH patients (6.8% vs. 4.6%; *p < 0.05). After controlling for patient- and hospital-level factors, patients at TSNH and non-TSNH facilities had equivalent odds ratio of death = 0.93 (95% confidence interval = 0.65-1.32). Similar results were obtained in all subset analyses.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated at TSNH have equivalent mortality compared with those treated at non-TSNH. Disparate trauma outcomes due to insurance status are not explained by differences between trauma treating institutions.

摘要

背景

在“安全网医院”(即照顾高比例未参保患者的医疗机构)接受治疗的患者,其治疗结果往往较差。本研究旨在分析在“创伤安全网医院”(TSNH)接受治疗是否能解释未参保和参保创伤患者之间已知的死亡率差异。

方法

对国家创伤数据库(6.2;2001 - 2005年)中年龄在18 - 64岁、中度至重度损伤(损伤严重程度评分≥9)的创伤患者进行回顾性分析。TSNH被定义为治疗≥47%未参保创伤患者的医疗机构。主要结局指标是TSNH与非TSNH治疗患者的校正死亡率。采用多水平分析,运用多重逻辑回归和广义估计方程来控制医院和患者层面的特征(年龄、性别、保险状况、损伤严重程度、休克以及损伤类型和机制)。还按医院创伤级别指定以及患者损伤严重程度和类型进行了亚组分析。

结果

共有343,053名创伤患者在46家TSNH和413家非TSNH接受治疗。与非TSNH患者(n = 306,279)相比,TSNH患者(n = 36,774)更可能是少数族裔(55%对27%;p < 0.05)。TSNH患者的未校正死亡率高于非TSNH患者(6.8%对4.6%;*p < 0.05)。在控制了患者和医院层面的因素后,TSNH和非TSNH机构的患者死亡比值比相当 = 0.93(95%置信区间 = 0.65 - 1.32)。在所有亚组分析中均获得了类似结果。

结论

在TSNH接受治疗的患者与在非TSNH接受治疗的患者死亡率相当。创伤治疗机构之间的差异并不能解释因保险状况导致的不同创伤结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验