• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国血液透析血管通路的流行病学

Epidemiology of hemodialysis vascular access in the United States.

作者信息

Lacson E

机构信息

Fresenius Medical Care-North America, Waltham, MA 02451-1457, USA.

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 2011 Jun;75(6):497-505.

PMID:21612752
Abstract

Reemergence of the importance of vascular access in the care of the chronic hemodialysis patient has gained prominence due to renewed interest in clinical outcomes and evidence-based interventions. Further fueled by anticipated regulatory changes in the reimbursement for dialysis care in the United States by 2011 and beyond, the drive to improve quality of care for hemodialysis patients has identified vascular access issues as a key contributor to outcomes. Focus has shifted from simply providing any hemodialysis vascular access to a strong preference for the use of native arteriovenous fistulas and subsequently to a need for reducing exposure to central venous catheters. Combined, these goals have forced a reevaluation of the role of arteriovenous grafts. The context and events associated with the evolution of thinking on these issues as well as available data supporting them are discussed. The key leadership role of nephrologists is emphasized along with a summary of problems and proposed solutions.

摘要

由于对临床结局和循证干预措施重新产生兴趣,血管通路在慢性血液透析患者护理中的重要性再度凸显。2011年及以后美国透析护理报销预期的监管变化进一步推动了这一趋势,改善血液透析患者护理质量的努力已将血管通路问题确定为影响结局的关键因素。关注点已从单纯提供任何血液透析血管通路,转向强烈倾向使用自体动静脉内瘘,随后又转向需要减少中心静脉导管的使用。综合起来,这些目标促使人们重新评估动静脉移植物的作用。本文将讨论与这些问题相关的思维演变背景和事件,以及支持这些观点的现有数据。文中强调了肾病学家的关键领导作用,并总结了问题及提出的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of hemodialysis vascular access in the United States.美国血液透析血管通路的流行病学
Clin Nephrol. 2011 Jun;75(6):497-505.
2
Fistula First clarifies definition of preferred access.“内瘘优先”明确了首选血管通路的定义。
Nephrol News Issues. 2010 Nov;24(12):54-7.
3
Hemodialysis vascular access: how do practice patterns affect outcomes?血液透析血管通路:实践模式如何影响治疗结果?
Nephrol Nurs J. 2004 May-Jun;31(3):305-8.
4
Interventional nephrology in Brazil: current and future status.巴西的介入肾脏病学:现状与未来发展
Semin Dial. 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):172-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2006.00146.x.
5
Ethical and legal obligation to avoid long-term tunneled catheter access.避免长期使用隧道式导管通路的伦理和法律义务。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Feb;4(2):456-60. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03840808. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
6
First hemodialysis access selection varies with patient acuity.首次血液透析通路的选择因患者的急症情况而异。
Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2000 Oct;7(4 Suppl 1):S4-10.
7
The success of Fistula First.
Nephrol News Issues. 2006 Feb;20(2):51, 53.
8
Nurses' impact on the choice and longevity of vascular access.护士对血管通路选择及使用寿命的影响。
Nephrol Nurs J. 2005 Nov-Dec;32(6):670-4.
9
Hemodialysis vascular access training and practices are key to improved access outcomes.血液透析血管通路培训和实践是改善通路预后的关键。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Dec;56(6):1032-42. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
Hemodialysis vascular access: everything you always wanted to know about it (but were afraid to ask).血液透析血管通路:你一直想了解但又不敢问的关于它的一切。
J Nephrol. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):836-47. doi: 10.5301/jn.5000209. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemodialysis access usage patterns in the incident dialysis year and associated catheter-related complications.起始透析年份的血液透析通路使用模式及相关导管相关性并发症。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Jan;61(1):123-30. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 16.