Suppr超能文献

眼科与视光学中进行一致性(临床检验比较)和精密度(重复性或再现性)研究的统计学方法。

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology.

机构信息

NH&MRC Centre for Clinical Eye Research, Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Jul;31(4):330-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x. Epub 2011 May 26.

Abstract

The ever-expanding choice of ocular metrology and imaging equipment has driven research into the validity of their measurements. Consequently, studies of the agreement between two instruments or clinical tests have proliferated in the ophthalmic literature. It is important that researchers apply the appropriate statistical tests in agreement studies. Correlation coefficients are hazardous and should be avoided. The 'limits of agreement' method originally proposed by Altman and Bland in 1983 is the statistical procedure of choice. Its step-by-step use and practical considerations in relation to optometry and ophthalmology are detailed in addition to sample size considerations and statistical approaches to precision (repeatability or reproducibility) estimates.

摘要

不断扩展的眼科学计量和成像设备选择推动了对其测量有效性的研究。因此,在眼科文献中,关于两种仪器或临床测试之间一致性的研究大量涌现。在一致性研究中,研究人员应用适当的统计检验非常重要。相关系数很危险,应避免使用。1983 年由 Altman 和 Bland 最初提出的“一致性界限”方法是首选的统计程序。除了考虑样本量和对精度(可重复性或再现性)估计的统计方法外,还详细说明了它在验光和眼科学中的逐步使用和实际注意事项。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验