NH&MRC Centre for Clinical Eye Research, Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Jul;31(4):330-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x. Epub 2011 May 26.
The ever-expanding choice of ocular metrology and imaging equipment has driven research into the validity of their measurements. Consequently, studies of the agreement between two instruments or clinical tests have proliferated in the ophthalmic literature. It is important that researchers apply the appropriate statistical tests in agreement studies. Correlation coefficients are hazardous and should be avoided. The 'limits of agreement' method originally proposed by Altman and Bland in 1983 is the statistical procedure of choice. Its step-by-step use and practical considerations in relation to optometry and ophthalmology are detailed in addition to sample size considerations and statistical approaches to precision (repeatability or reproducibility) estimates.
不断扩展的眼科学计量和成像设备选择推动了对其测量有效性的研究。因此,在眼科文献中,关于两种仪器或临床测试之间一致性的研究大量涌现。在一致性研究中,研究人员应用适当的统计检验非常重要。相关系数很危险,应避免使用。1983 年由 Altman 和 Bland 最初提出的“一致性界限”方法是首选的统计程序。除了考虑样本量和对精度(可重复性或再现性)估计的统计方法外,还详细说明了它在验光和眼科学中的逐步使用和实际注意事项。