Suppr超能文献

超声传导凝胶对甲状腺超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学标本的影响。

Effect of ultrasound transmission gel on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytological specimens of thyroid.

作者信息

Lalzad A, Ristitsch D, Downey W, Little A F, Schneider-Kolsky M E

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Francis Xavier Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2012 Oct;23(5):330-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00871.x. Epub 2011 May 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate prospectively the diagnostic impact of ultrasound coupling gel on thyroid specimens obtained under ultrasound guidance.

METHODS

Patients presenting for ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (USG-FNA) of the thyroid were invited to participate in the study. Four specimens per nodule were collected: two using chlorhexdine wash and two using sterile, colourless ultrasound gel as couplant according to routine protocol. All slides were analysed in a blinded fashion by two senior cytologists for the presence or absence of ultrasound gel-induced artefacts. The presence of gel-induced artefacts between the two groups was analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test. Kappa statistics were used to measure the inter-rater agreement between the cytologists.

RESULTS

Twenty thyroid nodules comprising 80 specimen slides were collected. On slides collected with gel, cytological artefacts were detected in 60-65% of cases compared with 10-15% of cases without gel (P<0.001). The inter-rater agreement between the two observers was very good (κ=0.84). Two of the 14 patients required repeat FNA due to non-diagnostic cytology results caused by inadequate sampling and gel-induced artefacts.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical cytopathologists, radiologists and sonographers should be aware of the potential for ultrasound gel to cause significant artefacts on cytological specimens. Our findings suggest that staff involved in USG-FNA cytology should remove the gel carefully before taking the aspirate.

摘要

目的

前瞻性研究超声耦合剂对超声引导下获取的甲状腺标本的诊断影响。

方法

邀请前来接受甲状腺超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(USG-FNA)的患者参与本研究。每个结节收集4份标本:两份使用洗必泰清洗,另外两份按照常规方案使用无菌、无色的超声凝胶作为耦合剂。所有玻片由两名资深细胞病理学家以盲法进行分析,以确定是否存在超声凝胶诱导的伪像。使用Pearson卡方检验分析两组之间凝胶诱导伪像的存在情况。kappa统计量用于衡量细胞病理学家之间的评分者间一致性。

结果

共收集了20个甲状腺结节,包括80份标本玻片。在使用凝胶收集的玻片上,60%-65%的病例检测到细胞学伪像,而未使用凝胶的病例中这一比例为10%-15%(P<0.001)。两名观察者之间的评分者间一致性非常好(κ=0.84)。14名患者中有2名因采样不足和凝胶诱导的伪像导致细胞学结果无法诊断而需要重复FNA。

结论

临床细胞病理学家、放射科医生和超声检查医生应意识到超声凝胶可能会在细胞学标本上造成显著伪像。我们的研究结果表明,参与USG-FNA细胞学检查的工作人员在吸取样本前应仔细清除凝胶。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验