Department of Paediatrics, Monash University Sunway Campus, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, JKR 1235, Bukit Azah, 80100, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
BMC Med Educ. 2011 May 28;11:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-25.
Previous studies report various degrees of agreement between self-perceived competence and objectively measured competence in medical students. There is still a paucity of evidence on how the two correlate in the field of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM). We undertook a cross-sectional study to evaluate the self-perceived competence in EBM of senior medical students in Malaysia, and assessed its correlation to their objectively measured competence in EBM.
We recruited a group of medical students in their final six months of training between March and August 2006. The students were receiving a clinically-integrated EBM training program within their curriculum. We evaluated the students' self-perceived competence in two EBM domains ("searching for evidence" and "appraising the evidence") by piloting a questionnaire containing 16 relevant items, and objectively assessed their competence in EBM using an adapted version of the Fresno test, a validated tool. We correlated the matching components between our questionnaire and the Fresno test using Pearson's product-moment correlation.
Forty-five out of 72 students in the cohort (62.5%) participated by completing the questionnaire and the adapted Fresno test concurrently. In general, our students perceived themselves as moderately competent in most items of the questionnaire. They rated themselves on average 6.34 out of 10 (63.4%) in "searching" and 44.41 out of 57 (77.9%) in "appraising". They scored on average 26.15 out of 60 (43.6%) in the "searching" domain and 57.02 out of 116 (49.2%) in the "appraising" domain in the Fresno test. The correlations between the students' self-rating and their performance in the Fresno test were poor in both the "searching" domain (r = 0.13, p = 0.4) and the "appraising" domain (r = 0.24, p = 0.1).
This study provides supporting evidence that at the undergraduate level, self-perceived competence in EBM, as measured using our questionnaire, does not correlate well with objectively assessed EBM competence measured using the adapted Fresno test.
International Medical University, Malaysia, research ID: IMU 110/06.
先前的研究报告显示,医学生的自我感知能力与客观测量的能力之间存在不同程度的一致性。但是,在循证医学(EBM)领域,关于两者如何相关的证据仍然很少。我们进行了一项横断面研究,以评估马来西亚高年级医学生的 EBM 自我感知能力,并评估其与 EBM 客观测量能力的相关性。
我们在 2006 年 3 月至 8 月期间招募了一组处于培训最后六个月的医学生。这些学生正在接受课程中临床整合的 EBM 培训计划。我们通过试点包含 16 个相关项目的问卷评估了学生在两个 EBM 领域(“搜索证据”和“评估证据”)中的自我感知能力,并用经过验证的 Fresno 测试的改编版客观评估了他们的 EBM 能力。我们使用 Pearson 积差相关来关联我们的问卷和 Fresno 测试中的匹配组件。
在队列中的 72 名学生中,有 45 名(62.5%)通过同时完成问卷和改编后的 Fresno 测试来参与。总体而言,我们的学生在问卷的大多数项目中都认为自己具有中等能力。他们平均给自己在“搜索”方面的评分是 10 分中的 6.34 分(63.4%),在“评估”方面的评分是 57 分中的 44.41 分(77.9%)。他们在 Fresno 测试的“搜索”领域中的平均得分为 60 分中的 26.15 分(43.6%),在“评估”领域中的平均得分为 116 分中的 57.02 分(49.2%)。学生的自我评分与 Fresno 测试中的表现之间的相关性在“搜索”领域(r = 0.13,p = 0.4)和“评估”领域(r = 0.24,p = 0.1)中均较差。
这项研究提供了支持性证据,表明在本科阶段,使用我们的问卷衡量的 EBM 自我感知能力与使用经过验证的 Fresno 测试衡量的客观 EBM 能力之间相关性不佳。
马来西亚国际医科大学,研究 ID:IMU 110/06。