Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 31, NO-5018 Bergen, Norway.
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 30;11:406. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-406.
The social gradient in disability pension is well recognized, however mechanisms accounting for the gradient are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between occupational class and subsequent disability pension among middle-aged men and women, and to what extent work-related factors accounted for the association.
A subsample (N = 7031) of the population-based Hordaland Health Study (HUSK) conducted in 1997-99, provided self-reported information on health and work-related factors, and were grouped in four strata by Erikson, Goldthorpe and Portocareros occupational class scheme. The authors obtained follow-up data on disability pension by linking the health survey to national registries of benefit (FD-trygd). They employed Cox regression analysis and adjusted for gender, health (medical conditions, mental health, self-perceived health, somatic symptoms) and work-related factors (working hours, years in current occupation, physical demands, job demands, job control).
A strong gradient in disability pension by occupational class was found. In the fully adjusted model the risk (hazard ratio) ranged from 1.41 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.33) in the routine non-manual class, 1.87 (95% CI 1.07 to 3.27) in the skilled manual class and 2.12 (95% CI 1.14 to 3.95) in the unskilled manual class, employing the administrator and professional class as reference. In the gender and health-adjusted model work-related factors mediated the impact of occupational class on subsequent disability pension with 5% in the routine non-manual class, 26% in the skilled manual class and 24% in the unskilled manual class. The impact of job control and physical demands was modest, and mainly seen among skilled and unskilled manual workers.
Workers in the skilled and unskilled manual classes had a substantial unexplained risk of disability pension. Work-related factors only had a moderate impact on the disability risk. Literature indicates an accumulation of hazards in the manual classes. This should be taken into account when interpreting the gradient in disability pension.
残疾抚恤金的社会梯度是众所周知的,然而,解释这种梯度的机制在很大程度上尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检验职业阶层与中年男女随后残疾抚恤金之间的关联,并探讨工作相关因素在多大程度上解释了这种关联。
基于人群的霍达兰健康研究(HUSK)的一个子样本(N=7031)于 1997-99 年进行,提供了健康和工作相关因素的自我报告信息,并按埃里克森、戈德索普和波塔卡罗雷斯职业阶层方案分为四个层次。作者通过将健康调查与国家福利登记(FD-trygd)相联系,获得了残疾抚恤金的随访数据。他们使用 Cox 回归分析,并根据性别、健康(医疗状况、心理健康、自我感知健康、躯体症状)和工作相关因素(工作时间、当前职业年限、体力需求、工作需求、工作控制)进行了调整。
发现残疾抚恤金与职业阶层之间存在很强的梯度。在完全调整的模型中,风险(风险比)在常规非体力劳动者阶层为 1.41(95%CI 0.84 至 2.33),在熟练体力劳动者阶层为 1.87(95%CI 1.07 至 3.27),在非熟练体力劳动者阶层为 2.12(95%CI 1.14 至 3.95),以管理员和专业人员阶层为参照。在性别和健康调整模型中,工作相关因素中介了职业阶层对随后残疾抚恤金的影响,常规非体力劳动者阶层为 5%,熟练体力劳动者阶层为 26%,非熟练体力劳动者阶层为 24%。工作控制和体力需求的影响较小,主要见于熟练和非熟练体力劳动者。
熟练和非熟练体力劳动者阶层的工人有相当大的未解释的残疾抚恤金风险。工作相关因素对残疾风险的影响只有中等程度。文献表明,体力劳动者阶层的危险会积累。在解释残疾抚恤金的梯度时,应该考虑到这一点。