Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1600, USA.
J Chromatogr A. 2011 Jul 15;1218(28):4452-61. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.05.035. Epub 2011 May 19.
The true efficiency of a column is derived from the differences between the variances of the peak profiles of the same compound recorded in the presence and the absence of the chromatographic column. These variances are usually derived using one of three methods: (1) the retention time of the peak apex and its half-height width; (2) the moments of the best fit between the experimental data and a hybrid response function, e.g., an exponentially convoluted Gaussian; or (3) the exact moments of the experimental band profiles. Comparisons of the results of these methods show that the first method is always inaccurate because all the band profiles recorded are strongly tailing. The peak fit method is accurate only for 4.6mm I.D. columns operated with instruments having low extra-column volume but fails for short narrow-bore columns due to the severe tailing of peaks passing through the complex channels of the extra-column volumes and to the inaccuracies in the fit of experimental data to the selected function. Although far better, the moment method may be inaccurate when the zero dead volume union used to measure the extra-column peak variances has a higher permeability than the column, causing the upstream part of the instrument to operate under comparatively low pressures.
柱效的真实值源于同一化合物在存在和不存在色谱柱的情况下记录的峰轮廓的方差差异。这些方差通常通过以下三种方法之一得出:(1)峰顶点的保留时间及其半峰宽;(2)实验数据与混合响应函数(例如指数卷积高斯函数)之间的最佳拟合矩;(3)实验带轮廓的精确矩。对这些方法的结果进行比较表明,第一种方法总是不准确的,因为所有记录的带轮廓都严重拖尾。峰拟合方法仅适用于 ID 为 4.6mm 的柱,在仪器具有低柱外体积的情况下操作,但对于短而窄的柱由于峰通过柱外体积的复杂通道严重拖尾以及对所选函数拟合实验数据的不准确性而失效。尽管要好得多,但当用于测量柱外峰方差的零死体积接头的渗透性高于柱时,矩法可能会不准确,导致仪器的上游部分在相对较低的压力下运行。