Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of SUN Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
J Neurol Sci. 2011 Aug 15;307(1-2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 May 31.
The lesion patterns and mechanisms of ischemic stroke caused by extracranial internal carotid artery (EICA) stenosis are well understood. The prognosis of intracranial internal carotid artery (IICA) stenosis is very poor. However, little is known about lesion patterns and mechanisms of cerebral infarcts caused by IICA stenosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the lesion patterns and mechanisms of infarcts produced by severe IICA stenosis and compare it with that produced by severe EICA stenosis.
We recruited 62 patients with acute cerebral infarcts who fulfilled the following criteria: 1) lesions of acute infarcts were verified by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) performed within 1 week of stroke onset; 2) infarct lesions were located within the territory of unilateral internal carotid artery (ICA); 3) infarcts were definitely caused by severe atherosclerosis stenosis (stenosis rate of 70%-99%) of the ipsilateral IICA or EICA, with all other potential causes of stroke being entirely excluded. According to the distributions of infarct lesions in the arterial territory of the ICA displayed on DWI, lesion patterns were classified as either 1) single infarct [perforating artery infarct (PAI), pial artery infarct (PI) or border-zone infarct (BZI)], or 2) multiple infarcts (a combination of types described above).
There were 29 patients with ischemic stroke caused by severe IICA stenosis, and 33 patients with stroke caused by severe EICA stenosis. Single BZI (14/29, P=0.015), and infarcts involving the border zone (19/29, P=0.021) or the internal border zone (13/29, P=0.013) were identified more often in patients with IICA stenosis compared to those with EICA stenosis. PI and/or PAI (22/32, P=0.021) were identified more often in patients with EICA stenosis.
Lesion patterns in patients with severe IICA stenosis were different from those with severe EICA stenosis. The hypoperfusion mechanism leading to BZI was more important for patients with severe IICA stenosis than for those with severe EICA stenosis. Embolisms leading to PI and/or PAI were more important for patients with severe EICA stenosis.
颅外颈内动脉(EICA)狭窄引起的缺血性卒中的病变模式和机制已得到充分了解。颅内颈内动脉(IICA)狭窄的预后非常差。然而,对于由 IICA 狭窄引起的脑梗死的病变模式和机制知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨严重 IICA 狭窄引起的脑梗死的病变模式和机制,并将其与严重 EICA 狭窄引起的脑梗死进行比较。
我们招募了 62 名符合以下标准的急性脑梗死患者:1)病变为急性梗死,经发病后 1 周内进行的弥散加权成像(DWI)证实;2)梗死病变位于单侧颈内动脉(ICA)区域内;3)肯定由同侧 ICA 或 EICA 的严重动脉粥样硬化狭窄(狭窄率为 70%-99%)引起,排除所有其他潜在的卒中原因。根据 DWI 上 ICA 动脉区域内梗死病变的分布,将病变模式分为 1)单发梗死[穿支动脉梗死(PAI)、软脑膜动脉梗死(PI)或交界区梗死(BZI)]或 2)多发梗死(上述类型的组合)。
29 例患者为严重 IICA 狭窄引起的缺血性卒中,33 例为严重 EICA 狭窄引起的卒中。与 EICA 狭窄患者相比,IICA 狭窄患者更易发生单一 BZI(14/29,P=0.015)和交界区或内交界区梗死(19/29,P=0.021;13/29,P=0.013)。EICA 狭窄患者更易发生 PI 和/或 PAI(22/32,P=0.021)。
严重 IICA 狭窄患者的病变模式与严重 EICA 狭窄患者不同。导致 BZI 的低灌注机制对严重 IICA 狭窄患者比严重 EICA 狭窄患者更为重要。导致 PI 和/或 PAI 的栓塞对严重 EICA 狭窄患者更为重要。