Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents for treatment of focal lesions in infrapopliteal arteries: a double-blind, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial.

AIMS

Preliminary reports indicate that sirolimus-eluting stents reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous infrapopliteal artery revascularization. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multi-centre, double-blind trial comparing a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent with a placebo-coated bare-metal stent in patients with either intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia who had a de-novo lesion in an infrapopliteal artery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

161 patients were included in this trial. The mean target lesion length was 31 ± 9 mm. The main study endpoint was the 1-year primary patency rate, defined as freedom from in-stent-restenosis (luminal narrowing of ≥50%) detected with duplex ultrasound if not appropriate with angiography. Secondary endpoints included the 6-month primary patency rate, secondary patency rate, and changes in Rutherford-Becker classification after 1 year. Twenty-five (15.5%) patients died during the follow-up period. One hundred and twenty-five patients reached the 1-year examinations. The 1-year primary patency rate was significantly higher in the sirolimus-eluting stent group (80.6%) than in the bare-metal stent group (55.6%, P= 0.004), and the 1-year secondary patency rates were 91.9 and 71.4% (P= 0.005), respectively. The median (interquartile range) change in Rutherford-Becker classification after 1 year was -2 (-3 to -1) in the sirolimus-eluting stent group and -1 (-2 to 0) in the bare-metal stent group, respectively (P= 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Mid-term patency rates of focal infrapopliteal lesions are substantially improved with sirolimus-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent. Corresponding to the technical results, the changes in Rutherford-Becker classification reveal a significant advantage for the sirolimus-eluting stent.