• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗比裸金属支架治疗降低了主肢动脉的临床事件发生率:随机试验的长期结果。

Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of infrapopliteal arteries reduce clinical event rate compared to bare-metal stents: long-term results from a randomized trial.

机构信息

Angiologie, Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):587-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.035.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.035
PMID:22878166
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study investigated the long-term clinical impact of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS) in treatment of focal infrapopliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that SES reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous infrapopliteal artery revascularization. No data from randomized trials are available concerning the clinical impact of this finding during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

The study extended the follow-up period of a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial comparing polymer-free SES with placebo-coated BMS in the treatment of focal infrapopliteal de novo lesions. The main study endpoint was the event-free survival rate defined as freedom from target limb amputation, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, and death. Secondary endpoints include amputation rates, target vessel revascularization, and changes in Rutherford-Becker class.

RESULTS

The trial included 161 patients. The mean target lesion length was 31 ± 9 mm. Thirty-five (23.3%) patients died during a mean follow-up period of 1,016 ± 132 days. The event-free survival rate was 65.8% in the SES group and 44.6% in the BMS group (log-rank p = 0.02). Amputation rates were 2.6% and 12.2% (p = 0.03), and target vessel revascularization rates were 9.2% and 20% (p = 0.06), respectively. The median (interquartile range) improvement in Rutherford-Becker class was -2 (-3 to -1) in the SES group and -1 (-2 to 0) in the BMS group, respectively (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term event-free survival, amputation rates, and changes in Rutherford-Becker class after treatment of focal infrapopliteal lesions are significantly improved with SES in comparison with BMS. (YUKON-Drug-Eluting Stent Below the Knee-Randomised Double-Blind Study [YUKON-BTX]; NCT00664963).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较雷帕霉素洗脱支架(SES)与裸金属支架(BMS)治疗局灶性腘下病变的长期临床影响。

背景

有证据表明,SES 可降低经皮腘下动脉血运重建后再狭窄的风险。但尚无随机试验数据可用于长期随访中该发现的临床影响。

方法

该研究延长了一项前瞻性、随机、多中心、双盲试验的随访时间,该试验比较了聚合物无 SES 与安慰剂涂层 BMS 在治疗局灶性腘下新发病变中的疗效。主要研究终点是无靶肢截肢、靶血管血运重建、心肌梗死和死亡的无事件生存率。次要终点包括截肢率、靶血管血运重建和 Rutherford-Becker 分级的变化。

结果

该试验纳入了 161 例患者。平均靶病变长度为 31 ± 9 mm。在平均 1016 ± 132 天的随访期间,35 例(23.3%)患者死亡。SES 组的无事件生存率为 65.8%,BMS 组为 44.6%(对数秩检验,p = 0.02)。截肢率分别为 2.6%和 12.2%(p = 0.03),靶血管血运重建率分别为 9.2%和 20%(p = 0.06)。SES 组和 BMS 组的 Rutherford-Becker 分级中位数(四分位距)分别改善了 -2(-3 至-1)和-1(-2 至 0)(p = 0.006)。

结论

与 BMS 相比,SES 治疗局灶性腘下病变可显著提高长期无事件生存率、截肢率和 Rutherford-Becker 分级的变化。(YUKON-药物洗脱支架在膝下-随机双盲研究[YUKON-BTX];NCT00664963)。

相似文献

1
Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of infrapopliteal arteries reduce clinical event rate compared to bare-metal stents: long-term results from a randomized trial.西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗比裸金属支架治疗降低了主肢动脉的临床事件发生率:随机试验的长期结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):587-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.035.
2
Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents for treatment of focal lesions in infrapopliteal arteries: a double-blind, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial.西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗腘动脉局灶性病变的双盲、多中心、随机临床试验。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(18):2274-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr144. Epub 2011 May 26.
3
5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后5年临床结局:来自4项比较西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架的随机试验患者水平汇总分析的见解
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 1;54(10):894-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.077.
4
Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial.雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入病变大隐静脉桥血管的随机双盲比较:RRISC 试验的六个月血管造影、血管内超声及临床随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.021. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
5
Firebird and cypher sirolimus-eluting stents and bare metal stents in treatment of very long coronary lesions.火鸟和西罗莫司洗脱 Cypher 支架及裸金属支架治疗极长冠状动脉病变
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Aug 20;121(16):1518-23.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes with sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: five-year results of the RAVEL trial.西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的长期临床结果:RAVEL试验的五年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.029. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
7
Maintenance of long-term clinical benefit with sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 3-year results of the SESAMI (sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in acute myocardial infarction) trial.在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,西罗莫司洗脱支架的长期临床获益维持:SESAMI(急性心肌梗死中西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架比较)试验 3 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):810-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.046.
8
Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study.西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄患者的长期临床获益:RIBS-II(支架内再狭窄:球囊血管成形术与择期西罗莫司洗脱支架置入术)研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 11;52(20):1621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.025.
9
Comparison of six-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents to bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis of the RESEARCH (rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) and T-SEARCH (taxus stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) registries.雷帕霉素洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的六年临床结局比较:RESEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院评估的雷帕霉素洗脱支架)和T-SEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院评估的紫杉醇洗脱支架)注册研究分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Aug;23(8):336-41.
10
Long-term outcome in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents in complex coronary artery lesions: 3-year results of the SCANDSTENT (Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-Stress/Benestent Disease) trial.西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗复杂冠状动脉病变患者的长期预后:SCANDSTENT(非应激/贝内斯特恩特病冠状动脉支架置入术)试验的3年结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 27;51(21):2011-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.056.

引用本文的文献

1
The preclinical study of biocompatibility of tyrosine polycarbonate bioresorbable scaffold in small caliber porcine peripheral arteries.酪氨酸聚碳酸酯生物可吸收支架在小型猪外周小口径动脉中的生物相容性临床前研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91759-6.
2
[AVK III: Below the knee].[AVK III:膝下]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;66(3):268-273. doi: 10.1007/s00108-025-01871-y. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
Magnetic resonance angiography in diagnostic long-term follow-up of primary patency of the MOTIV drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in the region below the knee: 5 years of experience.
磁共振血管造影在MOTIV药物洗脱生物可吸收血管支架膝关节以下区域原发性通畅性诊断长期随访中的应用:5年经验
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0313696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313696. eCollection 2025.
4
Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on peripheral artery disease.巴西血管病学与血管外科学会关于外周动脉疾病的指南
J Vasc Bras. 2024 Oct 28;23:e20230059. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300592. eCollection 2024.
5
Surgical and Endovascular Therapies for Below-the-Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Contemporary Review.膝下外周动脉疾病的手术及血管内治疗:当代综述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Jan 29;3(3Part A):101268. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101268. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Evaluation of an Infrapopliteal Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold: Design Methodology for the LIFE-BTK Randomized Controlled Trial.腘下药物洗脱可吸收支架的评估:LIFE-BTK随机对照试验的设计方法
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 May 19;2(4):100964. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100964. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
7
Dual-pathway inhibition in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia requiring reintervention for infrapopliteal occlusions.慢性肢体严重缺血患者再干预治疗时,需要抑制双重通路以改善胫下闭塞。
Heart Vessels. 2024 Sep;39(9):771-777. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02406-5. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
8
Current Status of and Future Prospects for Drug-Eluting Stents and Scaffolds in Infrapopliteal Arteries.药物洗脱支架和支架在腘下动脉中的现状与未来前景
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):1757. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061757.
9
Meta-analysis of outcomes from drug-eluting stent implantation in infrapopliteal arteries.腘下动脉药物洗脱支架植入术疗效的Meta分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Aug 6;11(22):5273-5287. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i22.5273.
10
Below-the-Knee Stents and Scaffolds: A Comprehensive Review.膝下支架与支架植入物:全面综述
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2023 Jun 16;40(2):167-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-57263. eCollection 2023 Apr.