Evolutionary and Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6 Canada.
Am J Bot. 2008 Dec;95(12):1596-605. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800322.
Inbreeding depression should evolve with selfing rate when frequent inbreeding results in exposure of and selection against deleterious alleles. The selfing rate may be modified by plant traits such as flower size, or by population characteristics such as census size that can affect the probability of biparental inbreeding. Here we quantify inbreeding depression (δ) among different population sizes of Collinsia parviflora, a wildflower with interpopulation variation in flower size, by comparing fitness components and multiplicative fitness of experimentally produced selfed and outcrossed offspring. Selfed offspring had reduced multiplicative fitness compared to outcrossed offspring, but inbreeding depression was low in all combinations of population size and flower size (δ ≤ 0.05) except in large populations of large-flowered plants (δ = 0.45). The decrement to multiplicative fitness with inbreeding was not affected by population size nested within flower size, but differed between small- and large-flowered plants: small-flowered populations had lower overall inbreeding depression (δ = 0.04) compared to large-flowered populations (δ = 0.25). The difference in load with flower size suggests that either selection has removed deleterious recessive alleles or these alleles have become fixed in small-flowered, potentially more selfing populations, but that purging has not occurred to the same extent in presumably outcrossing large-flowered populations.
当近亲繁殖导致有害等位基因暴露和选择时,近亲繁殖衰退应该随自交率而进化。自交率可能会被植物性状(如花的大小)或种群特征(如种群大小)所改变,这些特征会影响双亲近亲繁殖的概率。在这里,我们通过比较实验产生的自交和异交后代的适合度分量和乘法适合度,来量化花的大小在不同种群大小的 Collinsia parviflora 中的近亲繁殖衰退(δ)。与异交后代相比,自交后代的乘法适合度降低,但在种群大小和花大小的所有组合中,近亲繁殖衰退都很低(δ≤0.05),除了大种群的大花植物(δ=0.45)。与近亲繁殖相关的乘法适合度下降不受花大小内嵌套的种群大小的影响,但在小花和大花植物之间存在差异:小花种群的总体近亲繁殖衰退(δ=0.04)低于大花种群(δ=0.25)。与花大小的负荷差异表明,选择要么已经消除了有害的隐性等位基因,要么这些等位基因已经在小花、潜在的自交更多的种群中固定,但在假定的异交大花种群中,清除并没有达到相同的程度。