• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用质子治疗肺部肿瘤时,由于计划 CT 的体素尺寸有限,导致计划剂量存在不确定性。

Uncertainties in planned dose due to the limited voxel size of the planning CT when treating lung tumors with proton therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 7;56(13):3843-56. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/13/007. Epub 2011 May 31.

DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/56/13/007
PMID:21628773
Abstract

Dose calculation for lung tumors can be challenging due to the low density and the fine structure of the geometry. The latter is not fully considered in the CT image resolution used in treatment planning causing the prediction of a more homogeneous tissue distribution. In proton therapy, this could result in predicting an unrealistically sharp distal dose falloff, i.e. an underestimation of the distal dose falloff degradation. The goal of this work was the quantification of such effects. Two computational phantoms resembling a two-dimensional heterogeneous random lung geometry and a swine lung were considered applying a variety of voxel sizes for dose calculation. Monte Carlo simulations were used to compare the dose distributions predicted with the voxel size typically used for the treatment planning procedure with those expected to be delivered using the finest resolution. The results show, for example, distal falloff position differences of up to 4 mm between planned and expected dose at the 90% level for the heterogeneous random lung (assuming treatment plan on a 2 × 2 × 2.5 mm(3) grid). For the swine lung, differences of up to 38 mm were seen when airways are present in the beam path when the treatment plan was done on a 0.8 × 0.8 × 2.4 mm(3) grid. The two-dimensional heterogeneous random lung phantom apparently does not describe the impact of the geometry adequately because of the lack of heterogeneities in the axial direction. The differences observed in the swine lung between planned and expected dose are presumably due to the poor axial resolution of the CT images used in clinical routine. In conclusion, when assigning margins for treatment planning for lung cancer, proton range uncertainties due to the heterogeneous lung geometry and CT image resolution need to be considered.

摘要

由于肺部肿瘤的密度低且几何形状精细,因此剂量计算颇具挑战性。在治疗计划中使用的 CT 图像分辨率并未充分考虑到后者,这导致预测组织分布更加均匀。在质子治疗中,这可能导致预测出不切实际的陡峭的远端剂量下降,即远端剂量下降退化的低估。这项工作的目的是量化这些影响。考虑了两个类似于二维不均匀随机肺几何形状和猪肺的计算体模,并针对各种体素大小进行了剂量计算。使用蒙特卡罗模拟来比较通常用于治疗计划过程的体素大小预测的剂量分布与预计使用最精细分辨率交付的剂量分布。例如,对于不均匀随机肺(假设在 2×2×2.5mm³网格上进行治疗计划),在 90%水平下,计划剂量与预期剂量之间的远端下降位置差异最大可达 4mm。当气道存在于射束路径中时,对于猪肺,当在 0.8×0.8×2.4mm³网格上进行治疗计划时,最大差异可达 38mm。二维不均匀随机肺体模显然不能充分描述几何形状的影响,因为轴向方向缺乏不均匀性。在猪肺中,计划剂量与预期剂量之间观察到的差异可能归因于临床常规中使用的 CT 图像的轴向分辨率较差。总之,在为肺癌分配治疗计划边缘时,需要考虑由于肺部不均匀性和 CT 图像分辨率导致的质子射程不确定性。

相似文献

1
Uncertainties in planned dose due to the limited voxel size of the planning CT when treating lung tumors with proton therapy.在使用质子治疗肺部肿瘤时,由于计划 CT 的体素尺寸有限,导致计划剂量存在不确定性。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 7;56(13):3843-56. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/13/007. Epub 2011 May 31.
2
An anatomically realistic lung model for Monte Carlo-based dose calculations.用于基于蒙特卡洛的剂量计算的解剖学逼真的肺部模型。
Med Phys. 2007 Mar;34(3):1013-25. doi: 10.1118/1.2437284.
3
The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.当根据剂量和 PET 活性分布预测质子束在患者中的射程时,CT 转换算法中的不确定性的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 21;55(24):7557-71. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/24/011. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
4
Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.通过逆蒙特卡罗治疗计划减少调强质子治疗中的不确定性
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Aug 7;54(15):4803-19. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/011. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
5
Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.质子束治疗中全蒙特卡罗剂量计算的临床应用
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Sep 7;53(17):4825-53. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/023. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
6
A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.一种用于质子束剂量计算的粒子轨迹重复算法。
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Mar 7;50(5):1001-10. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/022. Epub 2005 Feb 17.
7
4D Proton treatment planning strategy for mobile lung tumors.移动性肺部肿瘤的4D质子治疗计划策略
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 1;67(3):906-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.045.
8
Reporting and analyzing statistical uncertainties in Monte Carlo-based treatment planning.报告和分析基于蒙特卡洛的治疗计划中的统计不确定性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):1249-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.039.
9
Quantification of the dependencies of the Bragg peak degradation due to lung tissue in proton therapy on a CT-based lung tumor phantom.基于 CT 的肺部肿瘤体模中质子治疗中因肺部组织导致布拉格峰降解的相关性定量分析。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Aug 1;64(15):155005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2611.
10
Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.使用笔束算法和蒙特卡罗算法对剂量计算准确性进行定量评估以及临床质量保证要求。
Med Dosim. 2013 Autumn;38(3):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
On the Way to Accounting for Lung Modulation Effects in Particle Therapy of Lung Cancer Patients-A Review.肺癌患者粒子治疗中肺部调制效应的考量之路——综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 25;16(21):3598. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213598.
2
A Monte Carlo Determination of Dose and Range Uncertainties for Preclinical Studies with a Proton Beam.质子束临床前研究中剂量和射程不确定性的蒙特卡罗测定
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 15;13(8):1889. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081889.
3
Pro-con of proton: Dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulation over passive scatter for thoracic malignancies.
质子治疗的利弊:调强放疗对比被动散射放疗在胸部恶性肿瘤治疗中的剂量学优势
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep 7;15:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.11.005. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Comparing 2 Monte Carlo Systems in Use for Proton Therapy Research.比较两种用于质子治疗研究的蒙特卡罗系统。
Int J Part Ther. 2019 Summer;6(1):18-27. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-18-00043.1. Epub 2019 May 3.
5
Effects of the Bragg peak degradation due to lung tissue in proton therapy of lung cancer patients.肺癌患者质子治疗中因肺部组织导致布拉格峰降解的影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Oct 25;14(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1375-0.
6
3D-printable lung phantom for distal falloff verification of proton Bragg peak.用于质子布拉格峰远场跌落验证的可 3D 打印肺模型。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Sep;20(9):86-94. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12706.
7
Advances in the use of motion management and image guidance in radiation therapy treatment for lung cancer.肺癌放射治疗中运动管理和图像引导应用的进展。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug;10(Suppl 21):S2437-S2450. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.155.
8
Methodology for analysis and reporting patterns of failure in the Era of IMRT: head and neck cancer applications.调强放射治疗时代失败模式的分析与报告方法:头颈部癌应用
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jul 26;11(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0678-7.
9
Degradation of proton depth dose distributions attributable to microstructures in lung-equivalent material.肺等效材料中微观结构导致的质子深度剂量分布的退化。
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6425-32. doi: 10.1118/1.4932625.
10
Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.质子治疗剂量计算算法导致的部位特异性范围不确定性。
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Aug 7;59(15):4007-31. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4007. Epub 2014 Jul 3.