Macy Michelle L, Davis Matthew M, Clark Sarah J, Stanley Rachel M
Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-5456, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Jun;27(6):469-74. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31821c98a8.
The objective of the study was to compare change in asthma knowledge among parents with low or adequate health literacy after video or written asthma education delivered during their child's asthma-related emergency department (ED) visit.
We recruited a convenience sample of parents presenting to the ED with their asthmatic child 2 to 14 years old. Parents were randomized to receive video (intervention) or written (active-control) asthma education materials. Health literacy levels were determined using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine tool. Asthma knowledge was evaluated at enrollment and 6-week telephone follow-up. Differences in knowledge scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests; χ² tests were used for comparisons of categorical variables.
Of 150 eligible parents, 129 participated (86%), and 117 were eligible for follow-up. Telephone follow-up was completed with 86 parents (74%). Health literacy levels were low in 31% of the parents. High asthma knowledge scores at enrollment were achieved by 33% of low-literacy and 59% of adequate-health-literacy parents (P = 0.025). Improvement in knowledge was realized for low-literacy parents regardless of the type of education (P < 0.001). Parents with adequate health literacy showed increased knowledge scores only after viewing the video.
Asthma education materials distributed at the time of an ED visit increase parental knowledge about the disease. Video-based asthma education appears promising as a tool for increasing asthma knowledge in both low- and adequate-health-literacy parents.
本研究的目的是比较在孩子因哮喘相关疾病就诊急诊科期间接受视频或书面哮喘教育后,健康素养低或足够的家长在哮喘知识方面的变化。
我们招募了一个便利样本,即带着2至14岁哮喘患儿到急诊科就诊的家长。家长被随机分为接受视频(干预组)或书面(积极对照组)哮喘教育材料。使用医学成人识字率快速评估工具确定健康素养水平。在入组时和6周电话随访时评估哮喘知识。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析知识得分的差异;χ²检验用于分类变量的比较。
150名符合条件的家长中,129名参与(86%),117名符合随访条件。86名家长(74%)完成了电话随访。31%的家长健康素养水平较低。入组时,33%的低素养家长和59%的健康素养足够的家长获得了高哮喘知识得分(P = 0.025)。无论教育类型如何,低素养家长的知识都有提高(P < 0.001)。健康素养足够的家长仅在观看视频后知识得分有所提高。
在急诊科就诊时发放的哮喘教育材料增加了家长对该疾病的了解。基于视频的哮喘教育作为一种增加低健康素养和健康素养足够的家长哮喘知识的工具似乎很有前景。