Suppr超能文献

比较玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。

Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;27(4):373-7. doi: 10.1089/jop.2010.0195. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of bevacizumab and ranibizumab on visual function and macular thickness in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

The data of diabetic patients who had been treated with bevacizumab for DME were reviewed. Those patients who received 1 injection of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab with at least 6-month interval were considered for enrollment. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assesment with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart and central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) measurement using optical coherence tomography-3 before and after the injections were recorded as outcome measures.

RESULTS

The study included 29 eyes of 29 patients with a mean age of 56.18±13.07 years. The median BCVA was 59 ETDRS letters and the median CSMT was 411 μm preceeding the bevacizumab injection. At the 4th-6th week control after the injection, median BCVA increased to 61.50 ETDRS letters and the median CSMT decreased to 373 μm. This change in BCVA and CSMT was found to be statistically significant (P=0.029 and P=0.011, respectively). The mean interval between bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatment was 9.54±2.64 months. Ranibizumab treatment increased the median BCVA from 53 to 66 ETDRS letters and decreased the median CSMT from 428 μm to a level of 279 μm, which were statistically significant (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). The median change in BCVA was 4.5 ETDRS letters in the bevacizumab group and 6 ETDRS letters in the ranibizumab group (P=0.58), whereas the median changes in CSMT were 41 and 100 μm after bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections, respectively (P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab and ranibizumab are both effective antivascular endothelial growth factor drugs preferred in the treatment of DME. Our comparison of both therapies on the same patients suggested that the effect on BCVA was not statistically different, but ranibizumab provided more decrease in CSMT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗对糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者视力功能和黄斑厚度的影响。

方法

回顾了接受贝伐单抗治疗 DME 的糖尿病患者的数据。纳入了至少接受过 1 次玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗且间隔至少 6 个月的患者。使用光学相干断层扫描-3 测量治疗前后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)评估的早期治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)图表和中央视网膜厚度(CSMT)作为疗效指标。

结果

本研究共纳入 29 例 29 只眼患者,平均年龄为 56.18±13.07 岁。贝伐单抗注射前的平均 BCVA 为 59 ETDRS 字母,平均 CSMT 为 411 μm。注射后第 4-6 周进行的 4 次控制测量中,平均 BCVA 增加至 61.50 ETDRS 字母,平均 CSMT 降低至 373 μm。BCVA 和 CSMT 的这种变化具有统计学意义(P=0.029 和 P=0.011)。贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗之间的平均间隔时间为 9.54±2.64 个月。雷珠单抗治疗使平均 BCVA 从 53 增加到 66 ETDRS 字母,使平均 CSMT 从 428 μm 降低至 279 μm,这具有统计学意义(P<0.001 和 P<0.001)。贝伐单抗组 BCVA 的平均变化为 4.5 ETDRS 字母,雷珠单抗组为 6 ETDRS 字母(P=0.58),而贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗注射后 CSMT 的平均变化分别为 41 和 100 μm(P=0.005)。

结论

贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗都是治疗 DME 的有效抗血管内皮生长因子药物。我们在同一患者中比较这两种治疗方法的结果表明,BCVA 的效果没有统计学差异,但雷珠单抗能更明显地降低 CSMT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验