Department of Practice Learning, Faculty of Health, Birmingham City University, B15 3TN, United Kingdom.
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 May;32(4):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.010.
This study was undertaken in response to concerns raised by Duffy (2003) that assessors of practice were reluctant to fail student nurses in assessments. This generated doubts about the fitness to practice of some registered nurses. An investigation was undertaken into whether quantitative evidence supported the view that pre-registration nurses rarely failed practical assessments. Comparative failure rates from theoretical and practical assessments were requested from all 52 universities in England that offered pre-registration nursing programmes. Responses were received from 27. Findings indicated that a very small proportion of students failed practical assessments; failure rates for theory outstripped practice by a ratio of 5:1. A quarter of universities failed no students in practice. Students were most likely to fail in year one and least likely in year three. This study supports the belief that assessors of practice are reluctant to fail student nurses. It raises a number of questions about the influence that the systems and practices of professional bodies and universities have on practical assessment. However it also indicates that some student nurses have failed practical assessments and that some universities do have systems in place to address this issue.
本研究是针对达菲(2003 年)提出的评估者不愿意在评估中使护生不及格的担忧而进行的。这引发了对一些注册护士是否具备执业能力的质疑。本研究旨在调查是否有定量证据支持这样一种观点,即注册前护士很少在实践评估中不及格。从英格兰所有提供注册前护理课程的 52 所大学中,要求对理论和实践评估的比较失败率进行调查。共收到 27 所大学的回应。研究结果表明,极少数学生在实践评估中不及格;理论考试的不及格率是实践考试的 5 倍。四分之一的大学在实践中没有学生不及格。学生最有可能在第一年不及格,而在第三年最不可能。这项研究支持了实践评估者不愿意使护生不及格的观点。它提出了一些关于专业机构和大学的制度和实践对实践评估的影响的问题。然而,它也表明,一些护生已经在实践评估中不及格,并且一些大学确实有系统来解决这个问题。