Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy.
Am Heart J. 2011 Jun;161(6):1106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.003.
The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) evaluation of the aortic annulus (AoA), coronary artery disease (CAD), and peripheral vessels in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
In 60 patients referred for TAVI, the following parameters were assessed with 64-slices MDCT and compared with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and peripheral angiography: AoA maximum diameter (Max-AoA-D(MDCT)), minimum diameter (Min-AoA-D(MDCT)), and area; lumen morphology index ([Max-AoA-D(MDCT)/Min-AoA-D(MDCT)]); length of the left, right, and non-coronary aortic leaflets; degree (grades 1-4) of aortic leaflet calcifications; distance between AoA and left main coronary ostium and between AoA and right coronary ostium CAD and peripheral vessel disease.
The Max-AoA-D(MDCT) and Min-AoA-D(MDCT) were 25.1 ± 2.8 and 21.2 ± 2.2 mm, respectively, with high correlation versus AoA diameter measured with TEE (r = 0.82 and 0.86, respectively). The area of AoA, systolic and diastolic lumen morphology index were 410 ± 81.5 mm(2), 1.19 ± 0.1 and 1.22 ± 0.11, respectively. Aortic leaflet calcification score was 3.3 ± 0.5. The lengths of left, right, and non-coronary aortic leaflets were 14.2 ± 2.4, 13.7.1 ± 2.1, and 14.5 ± 2.6 mm, whereas distances between AoA and the left main coronary ostium and between AoA, and the right coronary ostium were 13.7 ± 2.9 and 15.8 ± 3.5 mm, respectively. Feasibility, negative predictive value, and accuracy for CAD detection versus ICA were 87%, 100% (CI 100-100), and 96% (95% CI 94-100), respectively. All patients (N = 17) who were ineligible for TAVI were correctly detected by MDCT.
A comprehensive MDCT evaluation of patients referred for TAVI is feasible, provides more accurate assessment than TEE of AoA morphology, and may replace peripheral angiography in all patients and ICA in patients without significant CAD.
本研究旨在评估在接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗的患者中,使用多排螺旋 CT(MDCT)综合评估主动脉瓣环(AoA)、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和外周血管的准确性。
在 60 例接受 TAVI 治疗的患者中,使用 64 排 MDCT 评估以下参数,并与经食管超声心动图(TEE)、冠状动脉造影(ICA)和外周血管造影进行比较:AoA 最大直径(Max-AoA-D(MDCT))、最小直径(Min-AoA-D(MDCT))和面积;管腔形态指数([Max-AoA-D(MDCT)/Min-AoA-D(MDCT)]);左、右和无冠状动脉瓣叶的长度;主动脉瓣叶钙化程度(1-4 级);AoA 与左冠状动脉主干开口和 AoA 与右冠状动脉开口之间的距离;CAD 和外周血管疾病。
Max-AoA-D(MDCT)和 Min-AoA-D(MDCT)分别为 25.1±2.8 和 21.2±2.2mm,与 TEE 测量的 AoA 直径高度相关(r 分别为 0.82 和 0.86)。AoA 面积、收缩期和舒张期管腔形态指数分别为 410±81.5mm²、1.19±0.1 和 1.22±0.11。主动脉瓣叶钙化评分 3.3±0.5。左、右和无冠状动脉瓣叶的长度分别为 14.2±2.4、13.7.1±2.1 和 14.5±2.6mm,而 AoA 与左冠状动脉主干开口和 AoA 与右冠状动脉开口之间的距离分别为 13.7±2.9 和 15.8±3.5mm。MDCT 检测 CAD 的可行性、阴性预测值和准确性与 ICA 相比分别为 87%、100%(95%CI 100-100)和 96%(95%CI 94-100)。所有(N=17)不适合 TAVI 的患者均被 MDCT 正确检出。
在接受 TAVI 治疗的患者中,综合 MDCT 评估是可行的,比 TEE 更准确地评估 AoA 形态,并且可以替代所有患者的外周血管造影和无明显 CAD 患者的 ICA。