• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市健康家园干预措施的影响

Impact of an urban healthy homes intervention.

作者信息

Polivka Barbara J, Chaudry Rosemary V, Crawford John, Bouton Phillip, Sweet Laura

机构信息

The Ohio State University, College of Nursing, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Health. 2011 May;73(9):16-20.

PMID:21644481
Abstract

In the study described in this article, the authors evaluated the impact of an urban Healthy Homes intervention that included educational home visits. Their one-group, pre-post design used a structured interview at baseline and postintervention. The sample (N = 84) was comprised of low-income children younger than 18 years of age with an asthma diagnosis or with an asthmatic mother. Children were primarily male (62%), < or =10 years old (74%), and lived in a single family home (69%) with moisture (61%). Interventions included a personalized action plan, education, demonstrations, and home remediation as needed. Significant post-intervention decreases occurred in reported asthma symptoms for the child, school days missed, caregiver work days missed, and emergency department/urgent care center visits. Caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life increased significantly. The comprehensive home visitation intervention program effectively impacted asthma symptoms, lost school and work days, emergency use of the health care system, and improved caregiver quality of life and self-efficacy.

摘要

在本文所述的研究中,作者评估了一项包括教育性家访在内的城市健康家庭干预措施的影响。他们采用单组前后测设计,在基线和干预后进行结构化访谈。样本(N = 84)由年龄小于18岁、被诊断患有哮喘或母亲患有哮喘的低收入儿童组成。儿童主要为男性(62%),年龄小于或等于10岁(74%),居住在单户家庭(69%),家中存在潮湿问题(61%)。干预措施包括个性化行动计划、教育、示范以及必要时的家庭整治。干预后,儿童报告的哮喘症状、缺课天数、照顾者误工天数以及急诊室/紧急护理中心就诊次数均显著减少。照顾者的自我效能感和生活质量显著提高。全面的家访干预计划有效地影响了哮喘症状、缺课和误工天数、医疗系统的紧急使用情况,并改善了照顾者的生活质量和自我效能感。

相似文献

1
Impact of an urban healthy homes intervention.城市健康家园干预措施的影响
J Environ Health. 2011 May;73(9):16-20.
2
Impact of LEED-certified affordable housing on asthma in the South Bronx.能源与环境设计先锋(LEED)认证的经济适用房对南布朗克斯区哮喘病的影响。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Spring;7(1):29-37. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0010.
3
The impact of an urban home-based intervention program on asthma outcomes in children.城市家庭干预方案对儿童哮喘结局的影响。
Public Health Nurs. 2014 May-Jun;31(3):243-52. doi: 10.1111/phn.12071. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
An examination of interventions to reduce respiratory health and injury hazards in homes of low-income families.一项关于减少低收入家庭住宅中呼吸健康和伤害风险的干预措施的研究。
Environ Res. 2009 Jan;109(1):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
5
Outcome of a randomized multifaceted intervention with low-income families of wheezing infants.针对喘息婴儿低收入家庭的随机多方面干预的结果
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Aug;161(8):783-90. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.8.783.
6
Evaluation of a Home-Based Environmental and Educational Intervention to Improve Health in Vulnerable Households: Southeastern Pennsylvania Lead and Healthy Homes Program.评估一项基于家庭的环境与教育干预措施以改善弱势家庭健康状况:宾夕法尼亚州东南部铅与健康家庭项目
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 9;13(9):900. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090900.
7
Delivering tailored asthma family education in a pediatric emergency department setting: a pilot study.在儿科急诊科开展针对性哮喘家庭教育:一项试点研究。
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4 Pt 2):S135-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2000K.
8
Findings from a community-based asthma education fair for Latino caregivers.针对拉丁裔照顾者的社区哮喘教育活动成果。
J Asthma. 2015 Feb;52(1):71-80. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.944982. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
9
The Seattle-King County healthy homes project: implementation of a comprehensive approach to improving indoor environmental quality for low-income children with asthma.西雅图-金县健康家园项目:为患有哮喘的低收入儿童改善室内环境质量的综合方法的实施
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):311-22. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2311.
10
Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma.城市哮喘儿童居家环境干预的结果
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 9;351(11):1068-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032097.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing supported self-management for asthma: a systematic review and suggested hierarchy of evidence of implementation studies.实施支持性哮喘自我管理:一项系统评价及实施研究证据的建议等级划分
BMC Med. 2015 Jun 1;13:127. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0361-0.