Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.037. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
To analyze prognostic factors in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and androgen deprivation (ADT).
Between 1998 and 2008 at the University of Michigan Medical Center, 718 men were consecutively treated with EBRT to at least 75 Gy. Seven definitions of high-risk prostate cancer, applying to 11-33% of patients, were evaluated. Biochemical failure (BF), salvage ADT use, metastatic progression, and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.
Each high-risk definition was associated with increased BF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.8-3.9, p < 0.0001), salvage ADT use (HR 3.9-6.3, p < 0.0001), metastasis (HR 3.7-6.6, p < 0.0001), and PCSM (HR 3.7-16.2, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, an increasing number of high-risk features predicted worse outcome. Adjuvant ADT yielded significant reductions in both metastases (HR 0.19-0.38, p < 0.001) and PCSM (HR 0.38-0.50, p < 0.05) for all high-risk definitions (with the exception of clinical Stage T3-4 disease) but improved BF only for those with elevated Gleason scores (p < 0.03, HR 0.25-0.48). When treated with ADT and dose-escalated EBRT, patients with Gleason scores 8 to 10, without other high-risk features, had 8-year freedom from BF of 74%, freedom from distant metastases of 93%, and cause-specific survival of 92%, with salvage ADT used in 16% of patients.
Adjuvant ADT results in a significant improvement in clinical progression and PCSM across multiple definitions of high-risk disease even with dose-escalated EBRT. There is a subset of patients, characterized by multiple high-risk features or the presence of Gleason Pattern 5, who remain at significant risk for metastasis and PCSM despite current treatment.
分析采用大剂量外照射放疗(EBRT)联合雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的高危前列腺癌患者的预后因素。
1998 年至 2008 年期间,密歇根大学医学中心对 718 名患者连续进行了至少 75Gy 的 EBRT。评估了适用于 11%-33%患者的七种高危前列腺癌定义。通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 比例风险回归估计生化失败(BF)、挽救性 ADT 使用、转移性进展和前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)。
每个高危定义均与 BF 增加相关(风险比[HR]2.8-3.9,p<0.0001)、挽救性 ADT 使用(HR 3.9-6.3,p<0.0001)、转移(HR 3.7-6.6,p<0.0001)和 PCSM(HR 3.7-16.2,p<0.0001)。此外,高危特征的数量增加预示着预后更差。辅助 ADT 对所有高危定义(除临床分期 T3-4 疾病外)的转移(HR 0.19-0.38,p<0.01)和 PCSM(HR 0.38-0.50,p<0.05)均有显著降低,但仅对那些具有升高的 Gleason 评分的患者改善 BF(p<0.03,HR 0.25-0.48)。当接受 ADT 和剂量递增的 EBRT 治疗时,Gleason 评分 8-10 分且无其他高危特征的患者,8 年无 BF 率为 74%、无远处转移率为 93%、特异性生存率为 92%,16%的患者需要挽救性 ADT。
即使采用大剂量 EBRT,辅助 ADT 也能显著改善多种高危疾病定义的临床进展和 PCSM。尽管采用了目前的治疗方法,仍有一部分患者存在多个高危特征或存在 Gleason 模式 5,他们仍存在转移和 PCSM 的显著风险。