• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建。

Revascularization of left main coronary artery disease.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Cardiol Rev. 2011 Jul-Aug;19(4):177-83. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e318219244d.

DOI:10.1097/CRD.0b013e318219244d
PMID:21646871
Abstract

Coronary artery disease with left main stenosis is associated with the highest mortality of any coronary lesion. Studies in the 1970s and 1980s comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and medical therapy showed a significant survival benefit with revascularization. In the angioplasty era, initial experience with percutaneous intervention was associated with poor clinical outcomes. As a result, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was restricted to patients who were considered inoperable, or those with prior CABG with a functional graft to the left anterior descending or circumflex artery ("protected left main disease"). With the introduction of drug-eluting stents, there are new studies demonstrating comparable survival in patients who were revascularized using PCI and CABG, although percutaneous revascularization is associated with a higher rate of repeat revascularization. In the SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trial, the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar between the CABG and PCI groups; however, the stroke rate was higher in the CABG group. The degree and extent of disease as defined by the SYNTAX scoring system has allowed for stratification of risk and improved assignment of patients with left main stenosis to either PCI or CABG.

摘要

左主干狭窄伴发的冠状动脉疾病与任何冠状动脉病变相比,死亡率最高。20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代的研究比较了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和药物治疗,结果显示血运重建具有显著的生存获益。在经皮血管成形术时代,最初经皮介入治疗的经验与较差的临床结局相关。因此,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)仅限于被认为不能手术的患者,或那些有功能的左前降支或回旋支旁路移植术(“保护左主干疾病”)的 CABG 患者。随着药物洗脱支架的引入,有新的研究表明,经 PCI 和 CABG 血运重建的患者的生存率相当,尽管经皮血运重建与更高的再次血运重建率相关。在 SYNTAX(PCI 与 Taxus 和心脏手术的协同作用)试验中,CABG 和 PCI 组的死亡、心肌梗死和卒中等复合终点发生率相似;然而,CABG 组的卒中转率更高。SYNTAX 评分系统定义的疾病程度和范围允许对风险进行分层,并改善了左主干狭窄患者的 PCI 或 CABG 分配。

相似文献

1
Revascularization of left main coronary artery disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建。
Cardiol Rev. 2011 Jul-Aug;19(4):177-83. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e318219244d.
2
Diabetic and nondiabetic patients with left main and/or 3-vessel coronary artery disease: comparison of outcomes with cardiac surgery and paclitaxel-eluting stents.左主干和/或 3 支血管病变的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者:心脏手术与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗结果的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 16;55(11):1067-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.057. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
3
Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.在 Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery(SYNTAX)试验中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗使用紫杉醇洗脱支架或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗新发左主干疾病患者的结局。
Circulation. 2010 Jun 22;121(24):2645-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.899211. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
4
Multivessel coronary revascularization in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: 3-year follow-up of the ARTS-II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study-Part II) trial.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的多支冠状动脉血运重建:ARTS-II(动脉血运重建治疗研究 - 第二部分)试验的3年随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 9;52(24):1957-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.010.
5
Nonrandomized comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians.八旬老人非保护左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗中冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非随机对照比较
Circulation. 2008 Dec 2;118(23):2374-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727099. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
6
Do differences in repeat revascularization explain the antianginal benefits of bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention?: implications for future treatment comparisons.再次血运重建的差异是否解释了搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比的抗心绞痛益处?对未来治疗比较的启示。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):267-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964585. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
7
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN-MAIN (ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization) Registry.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结局:ASAN-MAIN(ASAN 医疗中心-左主干血运重建)注册研究中裸金属支架 10 年和药物洗脱支架 5 年的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 19;56(17):1366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.097.
8
Impact of completeness of revascularization on the five-year outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft patients (from the ARTS-II study).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的血管重建完全程度对五年结果的影响(来自 ARTS-II 研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 15;106(10):1369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.069. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
9
Two-year (mid-term) results for unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous interventions with drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架用于无保护左主干冠状动脉经皮介入治疗的两年(中期)结果
Indian Heart J. 2008 May-Jun;60(3):195-9.
10
Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial.在紫杉醇药物涂层支架与心脏搭桥术联合治疗左主干病变研究中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):2388-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006689. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in patients with STEMI and unprotected left main stem disease: A systematic review & meta-analysis.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并无保护左主干病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Apr 25;40:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101041. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Combining PCI and CABG: the role of hybrid revascularization.PCI 与 CABG 联合治疗:杂交血运重建的作用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Apr;15(4):351. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0351-9.