• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化评估种植体扫描体适合度的可重复性——一项体外研究。

Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study.

机构信息

Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Josef-Heilingbrunnerstrasse 2, 93413 Cham, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):851-6. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5. Epub 2011 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5
PMID:21647591
Abstract

Dental restorations are increasingly manufactured by CAD/CAM systems. Currently, there are two alternatives for digitizing dental implants: direct intra-oral data capturing or indirect from a master cast, both with transfer caps (scanbodies). The aim of this study was the evaluation of the fit of the scanbodies and their ability of reposition. At the site of the first molars and canines, implants were placed bilaterally in a polymer lower arch model (original model), and an impression was taken for fabricating a stone cast (stone model). Ten white-light scans were obtained from the original and the stone model with the scanbodies in place. The scanbodies were retrieved after each scan and re-attached to the same implant or lab analogue. The first scan of the series served as control in both groups. The subsequent nine scans and control were superimposed using inspection software to identify the discrepancies of the four scanbodies in both experimental groups. The systematic error of digitizing the models was 13 μm for the polymer and 5 μm for the stone model. The mean discrepancy of the scanbodies was 39 μm (±58 μm) on the original implants versus 11 μm (±17 μm) on the lab analogues. The difference in scanbody discrepancy between original implants and lab analogues was statistically significant (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Scanbody discrepancy was higher on original implants than on lab analogues. Fit and reproducibility of the scanbodies on original implants should be improved to achieve higher accuracy of implant-supported CAD/CAM fabricated restorations.

摘要

牙科修复体越来越多地通过 CAD/CAM 系统制造。目前,数字化牙种植体有两种方法:直接口腔内数据采集或从主模型间接采集,都需要使用转移帽(扫描体)。本研究的目的是评估扫描体的拟合度及其重新定位的能力。在第一磨牙和尖牙部位,在聚合物下牙弓模型(原始模型)中双侧植入种植体,并进行印模以制作石模型。从原始模型和带有扫描体的石模型中获得了 10 个白光扫描。每次扫描后,将扫描体取出并重新连接到同一种植体或实验室模拟体上。系列中的第一扫描用作两组的对照。随后的九个扫描和对照使用检查软件进行叠加,以识别两组中四个扫描体的差异。聚合物模型数字化的系统误差为 13μm,石模型为 5μm。原始种植体上扫描体的平均差异为 39μm(±58μm),而实验室模拟体上为 11μm(±17μm)。原始种植体和实验室模拟体上扫描体差异的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05,Mann-Whitney U 检验)。原始种植体上的扫描体差异高于实验室模拟体。为了实现更高精度的 CAD/CAM 制造修复体,应改进原始种植体上扫描体的拟合度和可重复性。

相似文献

1
Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study.数字化评估种植体扫描体适合度的可重复性——一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):851-6. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5. Epub 2011 Jun 4.
2
Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.评价数字化方法中下颌四种植体模型的印模精度。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1137-42. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0622-z. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
3
Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners.口腔内扫描仪在牙种植数字化中的精度。
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):277-83. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4417.
4
Effect of Multiple Use of Impression Copings and Scanbodies on Implant Cast Accuracy.印模托盘和扫描体多次使用对种植体代型精度的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;34(4):891–898. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6945. Epub 2019 May 20.
5
Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: An in vitro study.全牙弓数字化种植体印模无或有扫描体架辅助的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2022 Apr;119:104072. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104072. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
6
In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.体外拟合 CAD-CAM 全弓螺钉固位钛和氧化锆种植体修复体,在 4 个种植体上制作。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):409-416. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
7
Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.三维计算机辅助制造单牙种植体最终印模的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):913-918. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
8
An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.种植体印模的准确性比较:编码愈合基台和不同种植体角度的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):90-100. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60346-7.
9
A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation.一种全数字化方法,用于复制种植体支持的全颌修复的功能和美学参数。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jul;62(3):383-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study.二氧化锆和钛计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造的 10 单位种植体支持螺钉固位框架的拟合精度:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):165-74. doi: 10.1111/clr.12039. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Intraoral Scanning Accuracy: From the Influencing Factors to a Procedural Guideline.提高口内扫描准确性:从影响因素到操作指南
J Clin Med. 2025 May 20;14(10):3562. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103562.
2
Differences between laboratory scanner and intra-oral scanner regarding axes and distances of three implants in a curved line when using two types of intra-oral scan bodies: in vitro study.使用两种口内扫描体时,实验室扫描仪与口内扫描仪在一条曲线上的三个种植体的轴和距离方面的差异:体外研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Apr 1;11(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00617-7.
3
Effect of reference objects on the accuracy of digital implant impressions in partially edentulous arches.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the three-dimensional correctness of impression techniques: a randomized controlled trial.印模技术三维准确性的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Quintessence Int. 2010 Nov-Dec;41(10):845-53.
2
Impact of abutment rotation and angulation on marginal fit: theoretical considerations.基台旋转和角度对边缘适合性的影响:理论考虑。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):752-8.
3
Theoretical optimum of implant positional index design.种植体位置指数设计的理论最优值。
参考物体对部分牙列缺损牙弓数字化种植印模准确性的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Oct;16(5):302-310. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.302. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
4
Effect of soft tissue thickness on accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques.软组织厚度对传统和数字化种植体印模技术准确性的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05037-4.
5
Knowledge structure and research hotspots on digital scanning for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A bibliometric analysis.种植支持全牙弓修复体数字扫描的知识结构与研究热点:一项文献计量分析
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36782. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36782. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
6
A systematic review of factors impacting intraoral scanning accuracy in implant dentistry with emphasis on scan bodies.系统评价影响种植体牙科中口内扫描准确性的因素,重点关注扫描体。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 May 1;10(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00543-0.
7
Effect of Repeated Use of Different Types of Scan Bodies on Transfer Accuracy of Implant Position.不同类型扫描体的重复使用对种植体位置转移精度的影响。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Dec 1;24(4):410-416. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.96149.1922. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Positional transfer accuracy of titanium base implant abutment provided by two different scan body designs: an invitro study.两种不同扫描体设计的钛基种植体基台位置转移精度:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03399-9.
9
How the geometry of the scan body affects the accuracy of digital impressions in implant supported prosthesis. study.扫描体的几何形状如何影响种植体支持修复体中数字印模的准确性。研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Dec 1;14(12):e1008-e1014. doi: 10.4317/jced.59948. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An study.数字化印模在全口种植义齿修复中比传统印模具有更高的准确性吗?一项 研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Oct-Dec;22(4):398-404. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_52_22.
J Dent Res. 2009 Aug;88(8):731-5. doi: 10.1177/0022034509341243.
4
Theoretical considerations: implant positional index design.理论考量:种植体位置指数设计
J Dent Res. 2009 Aug;88(8):725-30. doi: 10.1177/0022034509341172.
5
Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera.新型口腔内三维相机的准确性测试
Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(1):11-28.
6
The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review.种植体印模的准确性:一项系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Oct;100(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5.
7
Optical three-dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility.骨结合种植体位置的光学三维扫描采集:一项用于确定方法准确性和操作可行性的体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Sep;11(3):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00106.x. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
8
Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions?数字印模会消除传统印模当前存在的问题吗?
J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Jun;139(6):761-3. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0258.
9
Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations.数字化牙科:CAD/CAM 制作修复体的最新进展综述
Br Dent J. 2008 May 10;204(9):505-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350.
10
The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.使用加成型硅橡胶印模材料的四种印模技术的尺寸精度。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):29-33.