Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Josef-Heilingbrunnerstrasse 2, 93413 Cham, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):851-6. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5. Epub 2011 Jun 4.
Dental restorations are increasingly manufactured by CAD/CAM systems. Currently, there are two alternatives for digitizing dental implants: direct intra-oral data capturing or indirect from a master cast, both with transfer caps (scanbodies). The aim of this study was the evaluation of the fit of the scanbodies and their ability of reposition. At the site of the first molars and canines, implants were placed bilaterally in a polymer lower arch model (original model), and an impression was taken for fabricating a stone cast (stone model). Ten white-light scans were obtained from the original and the stone model with the scanbodies in place. The scanbodies were retrieved after each scan and re-attached to the same implant or lab analogue. The first scan of the series served as control in both groups. The subsequent nine scans and control were superimposed using inspection software to identify the discrepancies of the four scanbodies in both experimental groups. The systematic error of digitizing the models was 13 μm for the polymer and 5 μm for the stone model. The mean discrepancy of the scanbodies was 39 μm (±58 μm) on the original implants versus 11 μm (±17 μm) on the lab analogues. The difference in scanbody discrepancy between original implants and lab analogues was statistically significant (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Scanbody discrepancy was higher on original implants than on lab analogues. Fit and reproducibility of the scanbodies on original implants should be improved to achieve higher accuracy of implant-supported CAD/CAM fabricated restorations.
牙科修复体越来越多地通过 CAD/CAM 系统制造。目前,数字化牙种植体有两种方法:直接口腔内数据采集或从主模型间接采集,都需要使用转移帽(扫描体)。本研究的目的是评估扫描体的拟合度及其重新定位的能力。在第一磨牙和尖牙部位,在聚合物下牙弓模型(原始模型)中双侧植入种植体,并进行印模以制作石模型。从原始模型和带有扫描体的石模型中获得了 10 个白光扫描。每次扫描后,将扫描体取出并重新连接到同一种植体或实验室模拟体上。系列中的第一扫描用作两组的对照。随后的九个扫描和对照使用检查软件进行叠加,以识别两组中四个扫描体的差异。聚合物模型数字化的系统误差为 13μm,石模型为 5μm。原始种植体上扫描体的平均差异为 39μm(±58μm),而实验室模拟体上为 11μm(±17μm)。原始种植体和实验室模拟体上扫描体差异的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05,Mann-Whitney U 检验)。原始种植体上的扫描体差异高于实验室模拟体。为了实现更高精度的 CAD/CAM 制造修复体,应改进原始种植体上扫描体的拟合度和可重复性。