• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲决策程序与质量保证的现状:概述

The current status of decision-making procedures and quality assurance in Europe: an overview.

作者信息

Valerio L, Ricciardi W

机构信息

European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2011 Nov;14(4):383-96. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9333-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11019-011-9333-0
PMID:21647732
Abstract

The 2005 Report on Social Responsibility and Health of the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee (Ibc) proposes a new approach to implementing the right to healthcare and suggests a number of Courses of Action to be followed in various fields. Based on the latest available data, we intend to present an overview of the current state of European health systems in two of those fields-decision-making procedures and quality assurance in health care-and to attempt a comparison of the situation with the Report's provisions, in order to pave the way for the identification of what still has to be done to bridge international recommendations and the reality of policy and practice in Europe's health care.

摘要

联合国教科文组织国际生物伦理委员会(IBC)2005年的《社会责任与健康报告》提出了一种落实医疗保健权的新方法,并建议了在各个领域应遵循的若干行动方针。基于现有最新数据,我们打算概述欧洲卫生系统在其中两个领域——医疗保健决策程序和质量保证——的现状,并尝试将这种情况与该报告的规定进行比较,以便为确定在弥合国际建议与欧洲医疗保健政策及实践现实之间仍需采取的行动铺平道路。

相似文献

1
The current status of decision-making procedures and quality assurance in Europe: an overview.欧洲决策程序与质量保证的现状:概述
Med Health Care Philos. 2011 Nov;14(4):383-96. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9333-0.
2
Editorial for the thematic section "social responsibility and health".“社会责任与健康”主题版块的社论
Med Health Care Philos. 2011 Nov;14(4):353-4. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9343-y.
3
Social Responsibility and the State's Duty to provide Healthcare: An Islamic Ethico-Legal Perspective.社会责任与国家提供医疗保健的义务:伊斯兰伦理法律视角。
Dev World Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(3):205-214. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12140. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
4
The UNESCO Bioethics Declaration 'social responsibility' principle and cost-effectiveness price evaluations for essential medicines.联合国教科文组织《生物伦理宣言》的“社会责任”原则与基本药物的成本效益价格评估。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2005 Jul;24(3):10-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03351435.
5
Bioethics, health technology reassessment, and management.生物伦理学、卫生技术重新评估与管理。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2016 Nov;29(6):275-278. doi: 10.1177/0840470416659385. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Accountability in healthcare organizations and systems.医疗保健组织和系统中的问责制。
Healthc Policy. 2014 Sep;10(Spec issue):8-11.
7
National quality improvement policies and strategies in European healthcare systems.欧洲医疗体系中的国家质量改进政策与策略。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i22-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029355.
8
[Evaluation of health systems].[卫生系统评估]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2010;64(3):413-20.
9
Delivery of appropriateness, quality, safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction.提供适宜性、质量、安全性、效率和患者满意度。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jan;11(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.07.016.
10
Issues in quality assurance--the European scene.
Qual Assur Health Care. 1989;1(2-3):125-35. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/1.2-3.125.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial burden of household out-of-pocket expenditures for prescription drugs: cross-sectional analysis based on national survey data.家庭自费购买处方药的经济负担:基于全国调查数据的横断面分析
Open Med. 2011;5(1):e1-9. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
2
Towards hospital standardization in Europe.迈向欧洲的医院标准化。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):244-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq030. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
3
Hospital supplements in Belgium: price variation and regulation.比利时的医院补充剂:价格变化与监管。
Health Policy. 2009 Oct;92(2-3):276-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
4
Council of Europe. Recommendation Rec(2006)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on management of patient safety and prevention of adverse advents in health care.欧洲委员会。部长委员会向成员国提出的关于医疗保健中患者安全管理和不良事件预防的第Rec(2006)7号建议。
Eur J Health Law. 2008 May;15(1):79-98.
5
Shepherding major health system reforms: a conversation with German health minister Ulla Schmidt. Interview by Tsung-Mei Cheng and Uwe Reinhardt.引领重大医疗体系改革:与德国卫生部长乌拉·施密特的对话。由郑宗美和乌韦·莱因哈特进行采访。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):w204-13. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.w204. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
6
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries.医疗保健中的优先事项设定:八个国家经验教训。
Int J Equity Health. 2008 Jan 21;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-4.
7
[The German program for disease management guidelines. Results and perspectives].[德国疾病管理指南项目。结果与展望]
Med Klin (Munich). 2007 May 15;102(5):383-7. doi: 10.1007/s00063-007-1052-1.
8
What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views.评估医疗保健质量时什么是重要的?用户观点的国际比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb 21;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-16.
9
Technology assessment, priority setting, and appropriate care in Dutch health care.荷兰医疗保健中的技术评估、优先级设定与适当护理。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):35-43. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304000765.
10
Justice and solidarity in priority setting in health care.医疗保健资源分配中的公平与团结
Health Care Anal. 2003 Dec;11(4):325-43. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000010061.71961.87.