Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0154, USA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Jul;41(7):477-85. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3686.
Secondary analysis, cross-sectional study.
To (1) compare differences in individual comorbidity rates among patients with cervical, lumbar, and extremity pain complaints and (2) compare rates based on total number and severity in these same patient groups.
Comorbidities can impact recovery, prognosis, and potentially hinder participation in rehabilitation. Few studies have compared comorbidity rates among patients with different anatomical region of pain, to determine whether specific screening is warranted in physical therapy settings.
Included in the analyses were 2375 patients who reported complete demographic, clinical, and comorbidity information using Patient Inquiry software. Comorbidity data were collected from the Functional Comorbidity Index (18 items) and 6 additional comorbidities, to assess the presence of medical disease across multiple body systems. Comorbidities were further classified as "nonsevere" or "severe," based on inclusion in the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Chi-square analyses investigated differences in the rates of total number and severe comorbidities. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated on rates with statistically significant differences (P<.001), using the lumbar spine as the reference group.
Of the 24 comorbid conditions included in this analysis, 3 nonsevere medical conditions (degenerative disc disease, obesity, and headache) had different rates among anatomical region. A lower rate for degenerative disc disease was associated with the extremity conditions (χ2 = 66.3; OR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.50). Higher rate of headache (χ2 = 115.3; OR = 3.01; 95% CI: 2.45, 3.70) and lower rate of obesity (χ2 = 16.2; OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.80) were associated with cervical conditions. There were no differences among the 3 anatomical regions for total number or severe comorbidities.
Focused screening for degenerative disc disease, obesity, and headache may be warranted. However, the same strategy was not supported for total number or severe comorbidities, at least when considering comparative rates from this cohort. Physical therapists should consider the potential influence of total number and severe comorbidities equally for all anatomical regions of musculoskeletal pain.
Differential diagnosis/symptom prevalence, level 3b.
二次分析,横断面研究。
(1)比较颈痛、腰痛和四肢痛患者的个体合并症发生率的差异,(2)比较这些患者群体中基于总数量和严重程度的发生率。
合并症会影响康复、预后,并可能阻碍患者参与康复治疗。很少有研究比较不同解剖区域疼痛患者的合并症发生率,以确定在物理治疗环境中是否需要进行特定的筛查。
本分析纳入了 2375 名患者,他们使用患者问询软件(Patient Inquiry software)报告了完整的人口统计学、临床和合并症信息。使用功能合并症指数(18 项)和另外 6 种合并症收集合并症数据,以评估多个身体系统的医疗疾病的存在情况。根据纳入 Charlson 合并症指数的情况,将合并症进一步分类为“非严重”或“严重”。卡方分析调查了总数量和严重合并症发生率的差异。对于具有统计学显著差异的发生率(P<.001),使用腰椎作为参考组,计算比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
在本分析中包括的 24 种合并症中,3 种非严重的医疗状况(退行性椎间盘疾病、肥胖和头痛)在解剖区域之间存在不同的发生率。退行性椎间盘疾病发生率较低与四肢状况有关(χ2 = 66.3;OR = 0.40;95%CI:0.32,0.50)。头痛发生率较高(χ2 = 115.3;OR = 3.01;95%CI:2.45,3.70)和肥胖发生率较低(χ2 = 16.2;OR = 0.64;95%CI:0.51,0.80)与颈椎状况有关。在 3 个解剖区域之间,总数量或严重合并症的发生率没有差异。
可能需要针对退行性椎间盘疾病、肥胖和头痛进行有针对性的筛查。然而,对于来自该队列的比较发生率,至少没有支持总数量或严重合并症的相同策略。物理治疗师应平等考虑所有肌肉骨骼疼痛解剖区域的总数量和严重合并症的潜在影响。
鉴别诊断/症状流行率,3b 级。