• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖孕妇体重限制方案的标准产前保健总成本比较。

Total cost comparison of standard antenatal care with a weight gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women.

机构信息

Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Public Health. 2011 May;125(5):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.02.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2011.02.004
PMID:21658538
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a cost comparison of a weight gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women with standard antenatal care, and to identify if there were differences in healthcare costs within the intervention group related to degree of gestational weight gain or degree of obesity at programme entry.

STUDY DESIGN

A comparison of mean healthcare costs for participants of an intervention study at antenatal care clinics with controls in south-east Sweden.

METHODS

In total, 155 women in an intervention group attempted to restrict their gestational weight gain to <7 kg. The control group comprised 193 women. Mean costs during pregnancy, delivery and the neonatal period were compared with the costs of standard care. Costs were converted from Swedish Kronor to Euros (€).

RESULTS

Healthcare costs during pregnancy were lower in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in total healthcare costs (i.e. sum of costs during pregnancy, delivery and the neonatal period) between the intervention group and the control group. Within the intervention group, the subgroup that gained 4.5-9.5 kg had the lowest costs. The total cost, including intervention costs, was € 1283 more per woman/infant in the intervention group compared with the control group (P=0.025). The degree of obesity at programme entry had no bearing on the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The weight gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women was effective in restricting gestational weight gain to <7 kg, but had a higher total cost compared with standard antenatal care.

摘要

目的

比较肥胖孕妇增重限制计划与标准产前护理的成本,确定干预组内与妊娠期体重增加程度或计划入组时肥胖程度相关的医疗保健成本是否存在差异。

研究设计

在瑞典东南部的产前保健诊所,对干预研究的参与者与对照组进行平均医疗保健成本比较。

方法

共有 155 名参加干预组的妇女试图将其妊娠期体重增加限制在<7 公斤。对照组包括 193 名妇女。比较了妊娠期、分娩期和新生儿期的平均成本与标准护理的成本。成本从瑞典克朗转换为欧元(€)。

结果

干预组的孕期医疗保健成本较低。干预组与对照组之间的总医疗保健成本(即妊娠期、分娩期和新生儿期的成本总和)没有显著差异。在干预组内,增重 4.5-9.5 公斤的亚组成本最低。与对照组相比,干预组的每位女性/婴儿的总费用(包括干预费用)高出€1283(P=0.025)。入组时的肥胖程度对结果没有影响。

结论

肥胖孕妇增重限制计划可有效将妊娠期体重增加限制在<7 公斤,但与标准产前护理相比总费用更高。

相似文献

1
Total cost comparison of standard antenatal care with a weight gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women.肥胖孕妇体重限制方案的标准产前保健总成本比较。
Public Health. 2011 May;125(5):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.02.004.
2
The effect of an antenatal physical exercise programme on maternal/perinatal outcomes and quality of life in overweight and obese pregnant women: a randomised clinical trial.产前体育锻炼方案对超重和肥胖孕妇母婴/围产结局和生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BJOG. 2011 Nov;118(12):1455-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03084.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
3
Effects of lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women on gestational weight gain and mental health: a randomized controlled trial.肥胖孕妇生活方式干预对妊娠期体重增加和心理健康的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Jun;37(6):814-21. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.162. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
4
Weight gain restriction during pregnancy is safe for both the mother and neonate.孕期限制体重增加对母亲和新生儿均安全。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(10):1158-62. doi: 10.1080/00016340903214916.
5
Mighty Mums - An antenatal health care intervention can reduce gestational weight gain in women with obesity.强大妈妈——一项产前保健干预措施可减少肥胖女性的孕期体重增加。
Midwifery. 2015 Jul;31(7):685-92. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
6
Pregnancies complicated by obesity: clinical approach and nutritional management.肥胖合并妊娠:临床处理与营养管理
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2010;72(5-6):253-76.
7
Weight gain restriction for obese pregnant women: a case-control intervention study.肥胖孕妇的体重增加限制:一项病例对照干预研究。
BJOG. 2008 May;115(6):796; author reply 796. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01699.x.
8
Weight gain restriction for obese pregnant women.肥胖孕妇的体重增加限制
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Dec;89(12):1613. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.502221. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
9
Pregnancy complicated by obesity: midwifery management.肥胖合并妊娠:助产士管理。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;54(6):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.002.
10
Physical activity and psychological well-being in obese pregnant and postpartum women attending a weight-gain restriction programme.参加体重增加限制计划的肥胖孕妇和产后妇女的身体活动与心理健康
Midwifery. 2014 Jan;30(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the Salut Programme an effective and cost-effective universal health promotion intervention for parents and their children? A register-based retrospective observational study.“健康问候计划”对父母及其子女而言,是一项有效且具成本效益的全民健康促进干预措施吗?一项基于登记的回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e016732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016732.
2
Social inequality in excessive gestational weight gain.妊娠体重过度增加的社会不平等。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Jan;38(1):91-6. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.62. Epub 2013 May 2.
3
Effects of a weight-gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women on sickness absence and pregnancy benefits.
肥胖孕妇增重限制方案对病假和妊娠津贴的影响。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Jun;31(2):106-10. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.754091. Epub 2013 Jan 10.