• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初级保健中 FLU-FOBT 方案的效果:一项随机试验。

The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT program in primary care a randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, 94143-0900, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jul;41(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.011
PMID:21665058
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The FLU-FOBT Program is an intervention in which nurses provide home fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) to eligible patients during annual influenza vaccination (FLU) campaigns. The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT Program when implemented during primary care visits has not been extensively studied.

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT Program was tested as adapted for use during primary care visits in community clinics serving multiethnic patients with low baseline colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial. During intervention weeks, nurses routinely initiated the offering of FOBT to eligible patients who were given FLU (FLU-FOBT group). During control weeks, nurses provided FOBT with FLU only when ordered by the primary care clinician during usual care (FLU-only group).

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in six community clinics in San Francisco. Participants were patients aged 50-75 years who received FLU during primary care visits during an 18-week intervention beginning on September 28, 2009.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the change in CRC screening rates in the FLU-FOBT group compared to the FLU-only group at the end of the study period, on March 30, 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of becoming up-to-date with CRC screening.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed in 2010. A total of 695 participants received FLU on FLU-FOBT dates, and 677 received FLU on FLU-only dates. The CRC screening rate increased from 32.5% to 45.5% (+13.0 percentage points) in the FLU-FOBT group, and from 31.3% to 35.6% (+4.3 percentage points) in the FLU-only group (p=0.018 for change difference). For those due for CRC screening, the OR for completing CRC screening by the end of the measurement period was 2.22 (95% CI=1.24, 3.95) for the FLU-FOBT group compared to the FLU-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

FLU-FOBT Program participants were twice as likely to complete CRC screening as those receiving usual care. The FLU-FOBT Program is a practical strategy to increase CRC screening in community clinics. TRIAL REGISTRATION #: NCT01211379.

摘要

背景

FLU-FOBT 项目是一项干预措施,其中护士在年度流感疫苗接种(FLU)活动期间为符合条件的患者提供家庭粪便潜血检测(FOBT)。当在初级保健就诊时实施 FLU-FOBT 项目的效果尚未得到广泛研究。

目的

本研究旨在测试 FLU-FOBT 项目在为服务于具有低基线结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率的多种族患者的社区诊所进行初级保健就诊时的适应性。

设计

随机临床试验。在干预周期间,护士通常会向符合条件的接受流感疫苗(FLU-FOBT 组)的患者提供 FOBT。在对照周期间,护士仅在初级保健临床医生根据常规护理开出处方时才会在接受 FLU 的同时提供 FOBT(仅 FLU 组)。

地点/参与者:研究在旧金山的六家社区诊所进行。参与者为年龄在 50-75 岁之间的患者,他们在 2009 年 9 月 28 日开始的为期 18 周的干预期间在初级保健就诊时接受了 FLU。

主要观察指标

主要结局是在研究结束时(2010 年 3 月 30 日),FLU-FOBT 组与仅 FLU 组相比 CRC 筛查率的变化。使用多变量逻辑回归分析确定与 CRC 筛查相关的预测因素。

结果

2010 年进行了数据分析。共有 695 名参与者在 FLU-FOBT 日期接受了 FLU,677 名参与者在仅 FLU 日期接受了 FLU。FLU-FOBT 组 CRC 筛查率从 32.5%上升至 45.5%(+13.0 个百分点),仅 FLU 组从 31.3%上升至 35.6%(+4.3 个百分点)(FLU-FOBT 组变化差异有统计学意义 p=0.018)。对于需要进行 CRC 筛查的患者,FLU-FOBT 组完成 CRC 筛查的比值比(OR)为 2.22(95%CI=1.24,3.95),而仅接受 FLU 组为 1.00。

结论

FLU-FOBT 项目的参与者完成 CRC 筛查的可能性是仅接受常规护理的参与者的两倍。FLU-FOBT 项目是提高社区诊所 CRC 筛查率的实用策略。试验注册号:NCT01211379。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT program in primary care a randomized trial.在初级保健中 FLU-FOBT 方案的效果:一项随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jul;41(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.011.
2
The FLU-FIT program: an effective colorectal cancer screening program for high volume flu shot clinics.FLU-FIT 计划:一种针对高容量流感疫苗接种诊所的有效结直肠癌筛查计划。
Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):577-83.
3
Offering annual fecal occult blood tests at annual flu shot clinics increases colorectal cancer screening rates.在年度流感疫苗接种诊所提供年度粪便潜血检测可提高结直肠癌筛查率。
Ann Fam Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;7(1):17-23. doi: 10.1370/afm.934.
4
Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.多方面干预措施提高社区卫生中心年度结直肠癌筛查依从性的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1235-41. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2352.
5
Predictors of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) completion among low-income adults.低收入成年人粪便潜血试验(FOBT)完成情况的预测因素。
Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):676-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.010.
6
Randomized controlled trial of the impact of intensive patient education on compliance with fecal occult blood testing.强化患者教育对粪便潜血试验依从性影响的随机对照试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Mar;20(3):278-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40023.x.
7
Effects of communicating social comparison information on risk perceptions for colorectal cancer.传达社会比较信息对结直肠癌风险认知的影响。
J Health Commun. 2006 Jun;11(4):391-407. doi: 10.1080/10810730600671870.
8
Comparative effectiveness of two pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening interventions during an annual influenza vaccination campaign.两种基于药房的结直肠癌筛查干预措施在年度流感疫苗接种活动中的比较效果。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2010;50(2):181-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2010.09199.
9
The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT.两面之见:关于使用粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌的社区和医学观点的定性研究
Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.015.
10
Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.结直肠癌筛查中的完整诊断评估:研究设计与基线结果
Prev Med. 2001 Oct;33(4):249-60. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0878.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined Breast and Lung Cancer Screening Among Dual-Eligible Women: A Descriptive Study.双重资格女性的乳腺癌和肺癌联合筛查:一项描述性研究。
J Surg Res. 2025 Mar;307:204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.024. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Using the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) of Health Behavior Change to Explain the Seeking of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.运用健康行为改变的多理论模型(MTM)解释对结直肠癌筛查用粪便检测的寻求。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 10;20(16):6553. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166553.
3
Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.
患者对基于药房的结直肠癌筛查计划设计的偏好。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):99-112. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.增加多种癌症筛查接受度的综合干预措施及支持活动:概念框架、实施成功的决定因素、测量挑战及研究重点
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 5;3(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00353-8.
5
Outreach and Inreach Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latinos at a Federally Qualified Health Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2015-2018.2015-2018 年,在一家联邦合格健康中心对拉丁裔人群进行结直肠癌筛查的外展和内展策略:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Apr;110(4):587-594. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305524. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估旨在提高美国结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1645-1658. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637.
7
Have we increased our efforts to identify strategies which encourage colorectal cancer screening in primary care patients? A review of research outputs over time.我们是否加大了力度来确定鼓励初级保健患者进行结直肠癌筛查的策略?对一段时间内研究成果的综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 May 21;11:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.05.015. eCollection 2018 Sep.
8
A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States - How, what and when?美国农村和低收入人群结直肠癌粪便检测的临床和社区干预的系统评价 - 如何、什么和何时?
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 6;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3813-4.
9
Changes in Colorectal Cancer Screening Knowledge, Behavior, Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Barriers among Community Health Clinic Patients after a Health Literacy Intervention.健康素养干预后社区卫生诊所患者在结直肠癌筛查知识、行为、信念、自我效能及障碍方面的变化
J Community Med Health Educ. 2017 Feb;7(1). doi: 10.4172/2161-0711.1000497. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
10
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Chinese Americans: Efficacy of Lay Health Worker Outreach and Print Materials.结直肠癌筛查与华裔美国人:外展工作者宣传及印刷材料的效果
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):e67-e76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Dec 13.