Suppr超能文献

电穴位刺激(经皮电刺激神经疗法)治疗潜在性上斜方肌触发点的即时效果:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验

Immediate effect of electric point stimulation (TENS) in treating latent upper trapezius trigger points: a double blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Gemmell Hugh, Hilland Axel

机构信息

Anglo-European College of Chiropractic, 13-15 Parkwood Road, Bournemouth, BH5 2DF, UK.

出版信息

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jul;15(3):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 May 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of electric point stimulation in treating latent upper trapezius trigger points compared to placebo.

DESIGN

Double blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Anglo-European College of Chiropractic.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty participants with latent upper trapezius trigger points.

INTERVENTIONS

Electric point stimulator type of TENS, or detuned (inactive) electric point stimulator type of TENS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The three outcome measures were pressure pain threshold at the trigger point, a numerical rating scale for pain elicited over the trigger point, and lateral cervical flexion to the side opposite the trigger point.

RESULTS

On the outcome of pressure pain threshold the electric point stimulator group had a mean change of 0.49 (0.99) kg/cm(2), while the placebo group had a mean change of 0.45 (0.98) kg/cm(2) (t = 0.16, df = 58, p = 0.88). For change in pain over the trigger point, the electric point stimulator group had a mean decrease of 0.93 (0.87) points, while the placebo group had a mean decrease of 0.23 (0.97) points (t = 0.70, df = 58, p = 0.005). On the outcome of change in lateral cervical flexion the electric point stimulator group had a mean increase of 2.87 (4.55) degrees, while the placebo group had a mean increase of 1.99 (2.49) degrees (t = 0.92, df = 58, p = 0.36).

CONCLUSION

Electric point stimulator type of TENS is superior to placebo only in reduction of pain for treating latent upper trapezius trigger points.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨与安慰剂相比,穴位电刺激治疗潜在性上斜方肌触发点的即时效果。

设计

双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。

地点

英欧脊骨神经医学院。

参与者

60名患有潜在性上斜方肌触发点的参与者。

干预措施

经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)型穴位电刺激器,或失谐(无活性)的TENS型穴位电刺激器。

主要观察指标

三项观察指标分别为触发点处的压痛阈、触发点处诱发疼痛的数字评定量表,以及向触发点对侧的颈椎侧屈。

结果

在压痛阈结果方面,穴位电刺激器组的平均变化为0.49(0.99)kg/cm²,而安慰剂组的平均变化为0.45(0.98)kg/cm²(t = 0.16,自由度 = 58,p = 0.88)。对于触发点处疼痛的变化,穴位电刺激器组平均降低0.93(0.87)分,而安慰剂组平均降低0.23(0.97)分(t = 0.70,自由度 = 58,p = 0.005)。在颈椎侧屈变化结果方面,穴位电刺激器组平均增加2.87(4.55)度,而安慰剂组平均增加1.99(2.49)度(t = 0.92,自由度 = 58,p = 0.36)。

结论

TENS型穴位电刺激器在治疗潜在性上斜方肌触发点时,仅在减轻疼痛方面优于安慰剂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验